Interference of a weed community in the soybean crop in functions of sowing spacing

被引:13
|
作者
Vitorino, Hermeson dos Santos [1 ]
da Silva Junior, Antonio Carlos [1 ]
Goncalves, Clebson Gomes [1 ]
Martins, Dagoberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dept Prod Vegetal, Area Matol, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
来源
REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA | 2017年 / 48卷 / 04期
关键词
Critical Periods; Phytosociology; Glycine max; Weed Competition; CORN ZEA-MAYS; GLYCINE-MAX; PERIODS; YIELD;
D O I
10.5935/1806-6690.20170070
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The use of double row spacing on soybean crop is recent and consists of a new soybean production technology in Brazil and worldwide, so weed interference may be different in relation to single crop row. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the weed interference in soybean crop in function of sowing spacing. The experimental design was randomized blocks and treatments were arranged in a factorial (2x16): two spacings, a double row spacing [(0.20 x 0.20 m) x 0.67 m] and a conventional single row spacing (0.45 x 0.45 m) and sixteen periods of weed management, being eight control periods in which soybean was kept free of weeds by increasing periods of 7; 14; 21; 28; 35; 42; 49 and 145 days after emergence and eight coexistence periods, when the crop was maintained in the presence of the weed community for the same periods. The Critical Timing of Weed Removal (CTWR) was lower in the double row spacing, with eight days, compared with single spacing that was of 18 days. The Critical Weed-Free Period (CWFP) was of 36 and 31 days for double and single row spacing, respectively, and the emergence of weeds after this period did not cause damage to the productivity, but the Critical Period of Weed Control (CPWC) was higher in double row spacing (28 days) compared to the single row, which was of 13 days. The spacing in double row had a higher grain yield than the spacing in single row.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 613
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of sowing time on the interference relations between a weed community and peanut crop
    Nepomuceno, M. P.
    Alves, P. L. C. A.
    Dias, T. C. S.
    Cardozo, N. P.
    Pavani, M. C. M. D.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2007, 25 (03) : 481 - 488
  • [2] EFFECT OF WEED INTERFERENCE ON SOYBEAN CULTIVARS AT TWO SOWING TIMES
    Marangoni, R. E.
    Jakelaitis, A.
    Tavares, C. J.
    Rezende, B. P. M.
    Mello Filho, O. L.
    Cunha, P. C. R.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2013, 31 (03) : 511 - 519
  • [3] Effect of Peanut Crop Row Spacing on Weed Interference in the Culture
    Dias, T. C. S.
    Alves, P. L. C. A.
    Pavani, M. C. M. D.
    Nepomuceno, M.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2009, 27 (02) : 221 - 228
  • [4] Interference and phytosociological study of the weed community on direct sowing beet
    Carvalho, L. B.
    Pitelli, R. A.
    Cecilio Filho, A. B.
    Bianco, S.
    Guzzo, C. D.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2008, 26 (02) : 291 - 299
  • [5] RESPONSE OF SOYBEAN TO DATE OF SOWING AND SPACING
    BARIK, T
    SAHOO, KC
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1989, 34 (04) : 464 - 466
  • [6] SPEED OF SOWING ON SOYBEAN CROP
    Jasper, Roberto
    Jasper, Monica
    Assumpcao, Paulo S. M.
    Rocil, Jorge
    Garcia, Luiz C.
    ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2011, 31 (01): : 102 - 110
  • [7] WEED INTERFERENCE IN SOYBEAN CROP AFFECTS SOIL MICROBIAL ACTIVITY AND BIOMASS
    Fialho, C. M. T.
    Silva, A. A.
    Melo, C. A. D.
    Costa, M. D.
    Souza, M. W. R.
    Reis, L. A. C.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2020, 38
  • [8] WEED COMMUNITY INTERFERENCE AND PHYTOSOCIOLOGICAL STUDIES IN A SWEET SORGHUM CROP
    Giancotti, P. R. F.
    Moro, M. S.
    Nepomuceno, M. P.
    Barroso, A. A. M.
    Martins, P. F. R. B.
    Alves, P. L. C. A.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2017, 35
  • [9] Weed Interference in Okra Crop
    Santos, J. B.
    Silveira, T. P.
    Coelho, P. S.
    Costa, O. G.
    Matta, P. M.
    Silva, M. B.
    Drumond Neto, A. P.
    PLANTA DANINHA, 2010, 28 (02) : 255 - 262
  • [10] Weed interference on radish crop
    dos Santos, Valdere Martins
    da Silva, Luziano Lopes
    Ramos, Patriccia da Cruz
    Cardoso, Dione Pereira
    Vieira de Sousa, Daniele de Cassia
    APPLIED RESEARCH & AGROTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 9 (01): : 17 - 25