Early implementation of Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery training using a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum

被引:7
|
作者
Dyke, Christopher
Franklin, Brenton R.
Sweeney, W. Brian
Ritter, E. Matthew
机构
关键词
SKILLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2020.12.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: After the American Board of Surgery announcement of the Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum requirement in 2014, we implemented a dedicated endoscopy rotation at the post graduate year (PGY)2 level including a simulation curriculum for Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery skills. Here we evaluate the outcomes of this implementation. Methods: Beginning in 2015, we developed a clinical endoscopy and simulation-based rotation to pre-pare for Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery testing. Originally, our curriculum was based on the published Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories curriculum using the GI Mentor and transi-tioned to a mastery learning curriculum using the Endoscopy Training System in 2016. We evaluated the success of the curriculum in terms of first-time pass rates, training time required, and comparison to previously published benchmarks based on clinical experience. Results: Since 2015, a total of 37 general surgery residents in our program were Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery tested (PGY2 = 24, PGY3 = 4, PGY5 = 9); 84% (31) completed the Endoscopy Training System curriculum. At the time of testing, 73% (27) had performed <25 esophagogastroduodenoscopies, and 46% had performed <25 colonoscopies. Ninety-two percent (34) spent 10 hours or less completing the curriculum. The first-time pass rate for those completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum was 97% vs 67% for those not completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum (P = .01). For residents completing the Endoscopy Training System curriculum, total Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery scores were discernibly higher (472 vs 389, P < .01), as were 3/5 task scores (Nav1 80 vs 67, P = .02; Loop2 36 vs 8, P = .02; Retro3 89 vs 71, P = .02). Despite clinical inexperience (<25 esophagogas-troduodenoscopies and <50 colonoscopies), PGY2s yielded a mean score of 454 and a pass rate of 92%. This was similar to PGY5s (427, 89%; P = .3) and compares to benchmark data of endoscopists with >300 cases. Conclusion: Early implementation of flexible endoscopy training with a simulation-based curriculum results in Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery performance equal to a clinical experience not often gained during surgical residency. Often requiring <10 hours, this represents a fantastic return on in-vestment for this training. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1228 / 1233
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulation-based mastery learning significantly reduces gender differences on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery performance exam
    E. Matthew Ritter
    Matthew Lineberry
    Daniel A. Hashimoto
    Denise Gee
    Angela A. Guzzetta
    Daniel J. Scott
    Aimee K. Gardner
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 5006 - 5011
  • [2] Simulation-based mastery learning significantly reduces gender differences on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery performance exam
    Ritter, E. Matthew
    Lineberry, Matthew
    Hashimoto, Daniel A.
    Gee, Denise
    Guzzetta, Angela A.
    Scott, Daniel J.
    Gardner, Aimee K.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (12): : 5006 - 5011
  • [3] Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual skills exam
    E. Matthew Ritter
    Zachary A. Taylor
    Kathryn R. Wolf
    Brenton R. Franklin
    Sarah B. Placek
    James R. Korndorffer
    Aimee K. Gardner
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 413 - 420
  • [4] Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual skills exam
    Ritter, E. Matthew
    Taylor, Zachary A.
    Wolf, Kathryn R.
    Franklin, Brenton R.
    Placek, Sarah B.
    Korndorffer, James R., Jr.
    Gardner, Aimee K.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (01): : 413 - 420
  • [5] Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Curriculum Development Workbook
    Mcgaghie, William C.
    Barsuk, Jeffrey H.
    Salzman, David H.
    SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2025, 20 (1S): : S1 - S13
  • [6] Simulation-based mastery learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy training
    Maulahela, Hasan
    Annisa, Nagita Gianty
    Konstantin, Tiffany
    Syam, Ari Fahrial
    Soetikno, Roy
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 14 (09): : 512 - 523
  • [7] Development of a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Curriculum for Breaking Bad News
    Vermylen, Julia H.
    Wood, Gordon J.
    Cohen, Elaine R.
    Barsuk, Jeffrey H.
    McGaghie, William C.
    Wayne, Diane B.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 57 (03) : 682 - 687
  • [8] Mastery Learning Simulation-Based Curriculum for Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
    Zendejas, Benjamin
    Cook, David A.
    Hernandez-Irizarry, Roberto
    Huebner, Marianne
    Farley, David R.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 69 (02) : 208 - 214
  • [9] Development of a Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Curriculum for Late Goals of Care Discussions
    Walter, James M.
    Smith, Melanie M.
    Einstein, Noah
    Cohen, Elaine R.
    Wood, Gordon J.
    Vermylen, Julia H.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2024, 68 (01) : e54 - e61
  • [10] Training fellows in neonatal tele-resuscitation using a simulation-based mastery learning model
    Mavis, Stephanie C.
    Kreofsky, Beth L.
    Ouk, Melody Y.
    Carey, William A.
    Fang, Jennifer L.
    RESUSCITATION PLUS, 2021, 8