Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers

被引:4
|
作者
Tri Huu Nguyen [1 ]
Thanh Nhu Dang [1 ]
Schnelldorfer, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hue Univ, Dept Digest Surg, Sch Med & Pharm, Hue City, Vietnam
[2] Lahey Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Burlington, MA USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Medford, MA 02155 USA
关键词
PEPTIC-ULCER; SIMPLE CLOSURE; OMENTAL PATCH; RISK-FACTORS; INCISION; SURGERY; APPENDECTOMY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-019-05352-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Laparoscopic single-port surgery has widely been introduced for the treatment of various abdominal conditions. But controversies still exist regarding its potential advantages and risks, especially for emergency surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of a single-port laparoscopic repair using straight laparoscopic instruments for the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Methods A prospective consecutive case series was conducted including all patients with a perforated duodenal ulcer who underwent a laparoscopic single-port repair at a single institution from January 2012 to June 2018. The operation was performed through a single port using conventional straight laparoscopic instruments and intra-corporeal knot tying techniques. Results Out of 75 patients, simple closure of the perforation without omental patch was accomplished in 96% of cases. Conversion to an open operation was required in one patient (1.3%) due to a posterior duodenal perforation, and additional trocar placement was needed in another patient (1.3%). The mean incision length was 2.0 +/- 0.2 cm. The mean operation time was 63.0 +/- 26.6 min. Meantime a nasogastric tube remained in place was 2.9 +/- 0.8 days. Mean duration of analgesic use was 2.8 +/- 0.8 days. The rate of postoperative complications was 2.7%, including two patients with wound infections. There were no instances of intestinal leak or abscess. The postoperative hospital stay was 5.7 +/- 1.2 days. Conclusion Laparoscopic single-port repair using conventional straight laparoscopic instruments with intra-corporeal knot tying technique was safe and feasible for patients with perforated duodenal ulcers with low risk factors. This method offers results comparable to those expected with the standard multiport laparoscopic approach with the addition of improved cosmetic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1425 / 1430
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcers
    Tri Huu Nguyen
    Thanh Nhu Dang
    Thomas Schnelldorfer
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 1425 - 1430
  • [2] No Abdominal Drainage After Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Duodenal Ulcers
    Nguyen, Tri Huu
    Dang, Thanh Nhu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 83 (SUPPL 4) : 879 - 883
  • [3] No Abdominal Drainage After Single-Port Laparoscopic Repair for Perforated Duodenal Ulcers
    Tri Huu Nguyen
    Thanh Nhu Dang
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2021, 83 : 879 - 883
  • [4] Single-port laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer: intracorporeal "cross and twine" knotting
    Lee, Junhyun
    Sung, Kiyoung
    Lee, Dosang
    Lee, Wooyoung
    Kim, Wook
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (01): : 229 - 233
  • [5] Single-port laparoscopic repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer: intracorporeal “cross and twine” knotting
    Junhyun Lee
    Kiyoung Sung
    Dosang Lee
    Wooyoung Lee
    Wook Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 229 - 233
  • [6] Outcome of laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers
    Aljohary, Hisham
    Althani, Hassan
    Elmabrok, Gameela
    Hajaji, Khairy
    Taha, Ibrahim
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (04) : 216 - 219
  • [8] Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers with a falciform ligament patch
    Munro, WS
    Menzies, D
    Bajwa, F
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1996, 78 (04) : 390 - 391
  • [9] Comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers
    Lunevicius, R
    Morkevicius, M
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (12): : 1565 - 1571
  • [10] Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers
    R. Lunevicius
    M. Morkevicius
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2005, 19 : 1565 - 1571