Introducing diagnosis-related groups: is the information system ready?

被引:7
|
作者
Jian, Weiyan [1 ]
Lu, Ming [2 ]
Han, Wei [3 ]
Hu, Mu [4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth Sci Ctr, 38 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Dept Med Informat, Basic Med Sch, Hlth Sci Ctr, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Oxford, Blavatnik Sch Govt, Oxford, England
[4] Peking Univ, Clin Med Sch 3, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
diagnosis-related groups (DRGs); discharge data; coding standardization; China; DATABASE;
D O I
10.1002/hpm.2270
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Diagnosis-related group (DRG) system is a classification system widely used in health managements, the foundation of which lies in the medical information system. A large effort had been made to improve the quality of discharge data before the introduction of DRGs in Beijing. We extract discharge data from 108 local hospitals spanning 4years before and after standardization to evaluate the impact of standardization on DRG grouping performance. The data was grouped on an annual basis in accordance with Beijing's local DRG system. Proportion of ungrouped data, coefficient of variation (CV) and reduction in variance (RIV) were used to measure the performance of the DRG system. Both the descriptive and regression analysis indicate a significant reduction in terms of ungrouped data and CV for expenditure, increase of RIV for expenditure and length of stay. However, when there was no intervention, that is, between 2005 and 2006 and between 2008 and 2009, changes in these indicators were all insignificant. Therefore, the standardization of discharge data did improve data quality and consequently enhanced the performance of DRGs. Developing countries with a relatively weak information infrastructure should strengthen their medical information system before the introduction of the DRG system. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:E58 / E68
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Introducing Diagnosis-Related Groups in Kazakhstan: Evolution, achievements, and challenges
    Chanturidze, Tata
    Esau, Mike
    Holzer, Simon
    Richardson, Erica
    HEALTH POLICY, 2016, 120 (09) : 987 - 991
  • [2] DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS
    REDMAN, JF
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1984, 132 (04): : 778 - 778
  • [3] DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS
    THOMPSON, JD
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 308 (18): : 1107 - 1107
  • [4] DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS
    HUGHES, GS
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1984, 101 (01) : 138 - 138
  • [5] PROSPECTIVE PRICING SYSTEM BY DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS - COMPARISON OF FEDERAL DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS WITH HIGH-RISK OBSTETRIC CARE GROUPS
    RESNICK, MB
    ARIET, M
    CARTER, RL
    CAO, A
    FURLOUGH, RR
    EVANS, JH
    MCLEOD, AGW
    CRUZ, AC
    BUCCIARELLI, RL
    CURRAN, JS
    AUSBON, WW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 156 (03) : 567 - 573
  • [6] Diagnosis-related patient groups
    Kozierkiewicz, Adam
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2008, 66 (06) : 708 - 711
  • [7] THE FAILURE OF DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS
    SIGEL, GS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 143 (10): : 1317 - 1317
  • [8] MODIFICATION OF DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS
    IEZZONI, LI
    MOSKOWITZ, MA
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1985, 33 (02): : A254 - A254
  • [9] Introduction of the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) system into ophthalmology in Germany
    Neubauer, AS
    Kampik, A
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2001, 98 (09): : 900 - 904
  • [10] DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS - TOOL FOR MANAGEMENT
    BURIK, D
    NACKEL, JG
    HOSPITAL & HEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, 1981, 26 (01): : 25 - 40