Is there a dark side of managerial ability? Evidence from the use of derivatives and firm risk in China

被引:13
|
作者
Cheng, Lingsha [1 ]
Cheung, Adrian [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ, Dept Accounting, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Macau, Fac Finance, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
关键词
Management ability; Derivatives use; Firm risk; FOREIGN-CURRENCY DERIVATIVES; CORPORATE SPECULATION; AGENCY COSTS; CEO ABILITY; MANAGEMENT; EARNINGS; COMPENSATION; INCENTIVES; GOVERNANCE; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcae.2021.100258
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
In the absence of agency problems, firms with able managers are expected to use deriva-tives effectively for risk management purposes. But the agency theory suggests that self-interested managers may use derivatives to their advantage for rent-seeking activities. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2008 to 2019, we find strong evidence consistent with this rent-seeking idea. In particular, we find that the relationship between the use of derivatives and firm risk is negative, but this negative relationship is less pronounced for firms with high-ability managers compared to firms with low-ability managers, suggesting that managerial ability has a positive moderating effect on this negative relationship. In addition, this positive moderating effect is more (less) pronounced in firms with weak (strong) monitoring, diffuse (concentrated) ownership, high (low) information asymmetry, and weak (strong) corporate governance. The findings are robust to alternative measures of key variables, an alternative empirical model, and endogeneity concerns. Consistent with the view that able managers' rent-seeking activities (through taking risky derivatives position(s)) cannot enhance firm value or growth, further analyses reveal that both managerial ability and its interaction with the use of derivatives, have negative impacts on Tobin's Q. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Managerial interlocking networks and firm risk spillover: evidence from China
    Chen, Lin
    Niu, Ruiyang
    Yang, Yajie
    Zhao, Longfeng
    Xie, Guanghua
    Khan, Inayat
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2025, 21 (02) : 503 - 523
  • [2] Managerial Ability, Managerial Incentives and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam
    Nghi Huu Phan
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (04): : 193 - 200
  • [3] Managerial hedging ability and firm risk
    Lee M. Dunham
    Journal of Economics and Finance, 2012, 36 (4) : 882 - 899
  • [4] Managerial ability and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market
    Inam Bhutta, Aamir
    Sheikh, Muhammad Fayyaz
    Munir, Aroosa
    Naz, Aroj
    Saif, Iqra
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [5] Managerial hubris, firm expansion and firm performance: Evidence from China
    Jiang, Fuxiu
    Stone, Gregory R.
    Sun, Jianfei
    Zhang, Min
    SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2011, 48 (03): : 489 - 499
  • [6] Managerial myopia and firm productivity: Evidence from China
    Sheng, Xin
    Guo, Songlin
    Chang, Xiaochen
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49
  • [7] Managerial ability and goodwill impairment: evidence from China
    Huang, Qiubin
    Xiong, Mengyuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2024, 19 (04) : 921 - 940
  • [8] Managerial ability and firm risk-taking behavior
    Yung K.
    Chen C.
    Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2018, 51 (4) : 1005 - 1032
  • [9] The Dark Side of Investor Conferences: Evidence of Managerial Opportunism
    Bushee, Brian J.
    Taylor, Daniel J.
    Zhu, Christina
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 98 (04): : 33 - 54
  • [10] Firm performance, government regulation, and managerial effort: Evidence from China
    Wu, Dongxu
    Wu, Zhongmin
    STRATEGIC CHANGE-BRIEFINGS IN ENTREPRENEURIAL FINANCE, 2021, 30 (06): : 527 - 537