Evaluation of Methods for Estimating Transpiration Response to Soil Drying for Container-Grown Plants

被引:15
|
作者
King, C. Andy [1 ]
Purcell, Larry C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop Soil & Environm Sci, 1336 W Altheimer Dr, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA
关键词
MAX L. MERR; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; WATER-DEFICIT; N-2; FIXATION; TRAITS;
D O I
10.2135/cropsci2016.12.1000
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Physiological responses in plants to drought at various fractions of transpirable soil water (FTSW) are often presented relative to well-watered controls. Theoretically, this method allows for comparison of sensitivity among genotypes for various physiological processes and across experiments. It can be difficult to accurately estimate FTSW for measurements occurring over a relatively long period of time, such as gravimetric measurement of transpiration. This research evaluated the impact of determining the FTSW threshold at which transpiration begins to decline based on pot weights made at the beginning, ending, or average of daily transpiration periods. Pots were weighed once or three times daily during an 8-d soil-drying cycle for four soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]genotypes grown in 2-L pots. There were large artefactual differences in FTSW breakpoints among cultivars when either beginning or ending pot weights were used to estimate daily FTSW. In contrast, the estimated FTSW breakpoint was between 0.36 and 0.41 for all genotypes when the average of the beginning and ending interval pot weights was used to calculate FTSW, whether pots were weighed once or three times daily.
引用
收藏
页码:2143 / 2148
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IDAHO SOIL MIX - FOR CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS
    BOE, AA
    IDAHO AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION CURRENT INFORMATION SERIES, 1978, (429): : 1 - 2
  • [2] Response of container-grown grapevines to soil compaction
    Ferree, DC
    Streeter, JG
    HORTSCIENCE, 2004, 39 (06) : 1250 - 1254
  • [3] Response of container-grown apple trees to soil compaction
    Ferree, DC
    Streeter, JG
    Yuncong, Y
    HORTSCIENCE, 2004, 39 (01) : 40 - 48
  • [4] RESPONSE OF CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS TO 6 CONSUMER GROWING MEDIA
    BROWN, ODR
    EMINO, ER
    HORTSCIENCE, 1981, 16 (01) : 78 - 80
  • [5] LEAF COMPOST FOR CONTAINER-GROWN PLANTS
    SAWHNEY, BL
    HORTSCIENCE, 1976, 11 (01) : 34 - 35
  • [6] RESPONSE OF CONTAINER-GROWN RABBITEYE BLUEBERRY PLANTS TO IRRIGATION WATER-QUALITY AND SOIL TYPE
    HABY, VA
    PATTEN, KD
    CAWTHON, DL
    KREJSA, BB
    NEUENDORFF, EW
    DAVIS, JV
    PETERS, SC
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1986, 111 (03) : 332 - 337
  • [7] Evaluation of Biopolymer-coated Fiber Containers for Container-grown Plants
    McCabe, Kenneth G.
    Schrader, James A.
    Madbouly, Samy
    Grewell, David
    Graves, William R.
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 24 (04) : 439 - 448
  • [8] AN EVALUATION OF PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDES FOR CONTAINER-GROWN ORNAMENTAL PLANTS
    LAMONT, GP
    OCONNELL, MA
    NICHOLLS, PJ
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1985, 26 (03) : 241 - 251
  • [9] Container-grown Holly Response to Phosphorus
    Yeager, Thomas
    Larsen, Claudia
    HORTSCIENCE, 2009, 44 (04) : 1187 - 1187
  • [10] Suppressing Soil-Borne Diseases of Container-Grown Plants Using Composts
    Raviv, M.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HIGH TECHNOLOGY FOR GREENHOUSE SYSTEMS: GREENSYS2009, 2011, (893): : 169 - 181