Improving Risk-Based Screening at Vapor Intrusion Sites in California

被引:10
|
作者
Lahvis, Matthew A. [1 ]
Ettinger, Robert A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Shell Global Solut US Inc, 3333 Highway 6 South, Houston, TX 77082 USA
[2] 924 Anacapa St 4a, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
来源
关键词
Screening - Indoor air pollution - Environmental Protection Agency;
D O I
10.1111/gwmr.12450
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The attenuation factor (AF) of 0.03 recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is increasingly being used by regulatory agencies for the development of subsurface vapor screening levels for vapor intrusion (VI). There are concerns, however, over the database used to derive the AF and the AF's applicability to building types and geographies not included in USEPA database. To derive a more technically defensible AF for subsurface vapor screening in California, a database consisting of 8415 paired indoor and subsurface vapor samples collected from 485 buildings at 36 sites in California was compiled. Filtering was applied to remove data of suspect quality that were potentially affected by background (non-VI) sources. Filtering reduced the size of the database to 788 indoor air and subsurface vapor pairs, 80% of which were trichloroethylene (TCE) measurements. An AF of 0.0008 was derived from only TCE vapor data, based on the ability of the AF to reliably identify buildings with indoor air concentrations above screening levels in 95% of cases where subsurface vapor screening levels were exceeded. The AF derived from this study demonstrated limited sensitivity to the variables typically considered important in VI characterization, which was partially attributed to relatively weak correlation of indoor air and subsurface vapor concentration data. The results of this study can be used to improve VI screening in California and other states and help focus limited resources on sites posing the greatest potential risk.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vapor Intrusion Screening Model for the Evaluation of Risk-Based Vertical Exclusion Distances at Petroleum Contaminated Sites
    Verginelli, Iason
    Baciocchi, Renato
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (22) : 13263 - 13272
  • [2] Risk-Based Evaluation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Vapor Intrusion Studies
    Brewer, Roger
    Nagashima, Josh
    Kelley, Michael
    Heskett, Marvin
    Rigby, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 10 (06): : 2441 - 2467
  • [3] Vapor Intrusion Screening at Petroleum UST Sites
    Lahvis, Matthew A.
    Hers, Ian
    Davis, Robin V.
    Wright, Jackie
    DeVaull, George E.
    GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 2013, 33 (02): : 53 - 67
  • [4] Initial risk-based screening of potential brownfield development sites
    O'Reilly, Mary
    Brink, Ronald
    SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION, 2006, 15 (05): : 463 - 470
  • [5] Streamlining implementation of risk-based corrective action (RBCA) at California LUFT sites
    Odermatt, JR
    GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1998, 18 (01): : 71 - 73
  • [6] Analytical models for risk-based intrusion response
    Caskurlu, Bugra
    Gehani, Ashish
    Bilgin, Cemal Cagatay
    Subramani, K.
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2013, 57 (10) : 2181 - 2192
  • [7] Improving remediation decisions at hazardous waste sites with risk-based geostatistical analysis
    Ginevan, ME
    Splitstone, DE
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (02) : A92 - A96
  • [8] A RISK-BASED SCREENING APPROACH FOR PRIORITIZING CONTAMINANTS AND EXPOSURE PATHWAYS AT SUPERFUND SITES
    HOFFMAN, FO
    BLAYLOCK, BG
    FRANK, ML
    THIESSEN, KM
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1993, 28 (03) : 221 - 237
  • [9] Risk-Based Cholesterol Screening for Women
    Robbins, Cheryl L.
    Dietz, Patricia M.
    Cox, Shanna
    Kuklina, Elena V.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 22 (03) : 39 - 40
  • [10] Risk-Based Prostate Cancer Screening
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Albertsen, Peter C.
    Andriole, Gerald L.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 61 (04) : 652 - 661