The association between life history strategy and mate preference in men

被引:13
|
作者
Lu, Hui Jing [1 ]
Wong, Kam-chuen [1 ]
Chang, Lei [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Macau, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Life history; Mate preference; Good genes; Good mothers; Good providers; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; RISK; SELECTION; AGE; ENVIRONMENTS; EVOLUTION; HARSHNESS; ATTENTION; CHOICE; GENES;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.047
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The function of life history (LH) strategies acquired in response to ambient conditions during childhood is to maximize reproductive success. Mate preferences that facilitate reproductive goals should thus vary with LH strategies. In two studies, male participants completed measures of LH and mate preferences regarding fertility and good genes, fidelity and good mothers, and modernity and good provisioning (Study 1) or a face identification task designed to assess perceptual sensitivity toward neoteny representing fertility (Study 2). Results showed that men identified as of fast LH preferred physically attractive women and prioritized fertility and good genes over fidelity and good mothers in their mate selections. Moreover, they were sensitive to female fertility features, as evidenced by them spending less time identifying odd faces that differed from other faces in terms of neoteny. These findings suggest that men of faster LH are more likely to invest in mating than parenting and preferred mates of high reproductive potential over those representing high parental investment. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Association of life history strategy and mate retention behavior in men and women
    Pazhouhi, Sepide
    Garza, Ray
    Pazhoohi, Farid
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2024, 225
  • [2] Positive correlation between high mate value and slow life history strategy is moderated by trait heritability
    McDowell, Jackie
    Starratt, Valerie G.
    BIODEMOGRAPHY AND SOCIAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 66 (01) : 27 - 39
  • [3] Personality and evolutionary strategies: The relationships between HEXACO traits, mate value, life history strategy, and sociosexuality
    Strouts, Patrick H.
    Brase, Gary L.
    Dillon, Haley M.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 115 : 128 - 132
  • [4] Variation in Women's Mate Preferences over the Development of a Monogamous Relationship Corresponds with Changes in Men's Life History Strategy
    Owens, Rebecca
    Driscoll, Helen
    Farrelly, Daniel
    EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 6 (04) : 399 - 406
  • [5] Variation in Women’s Mate Preferences over the Development of a Monogamous Relationship Corresponds with Changes in Men’s Life History Strategy
    Rebecca Owens
    Helen Driscoll
    Daniel Farrelly
    Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2020, 6 : 399 - 406
  • [6] Comparing the characteristics of mate preference between China and Hungary
    Chen, Lijun
    Xun, Yushu
    Jiang, Xiaoliu
    Bothe, Beata
    Demetrovics, Zsolt
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2025, 239
  • [7] Human mate preference: inconsistency between data and interpretations
    Carere, Claudio
    Todde, Virginia
    Alleva, Enrico
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2010, 25 (09) : 489 - 490
  • [8] Association between Facial Metrics and Mate Rejection for Long-Term Relationship by Heterosexual Men
    Pinheiro, Luiza Penha
    Monteiro, Luis Carlos Pereira
    Henriques, Leonardo Dutra
    Souza, Givago Silva
    Miranda, Ana Catarina
    Costa, Marcelo Fernandes
    Henriques, Alda Loureiro
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2023, 15 (01):
  • [9] THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN RACIAL PREFERENCE AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE IN MID AND LATE LIFE
    Yang, M. S.
    Agrigoroaei, S.
    Huffman-Oh, P.
    Dugan, E.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 321 - 321
  • [10] Mate-preference drives mate-choice: Men's self-rated masculinity predicts their female partner's preference for masculinity
    Burriss, Robert P.
    Welling, Lisa L. M.
    Puts, David A.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 51 (08) : 1023 - 1027