Septoplasty: A comparison of septocolumellar and high septal hemitransfixion approaches to the nasal septum

被引:0
|
作者
Murthy, P [1 ]
Shenoy, PK [1 ]
机构
[1] Raigmore Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Otolaryngol, Inverness IV2 3UJ, Scotland
关键词
septoplasty; surgical approach; incisions; complications;
D O I
10.1159/000312925
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the classical septocolumellar approach with the high septal hemitransfixion incision for deformities of the nasal septum. Patients and Methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial of 56 patients undergoing primary septoplasty over a 6-month period was carried out. Pre-operatively, symptoms and signs were assessed. A high septal approach was used in 32 patients and a septocolumellar approach in 24 patients. Postoperative evaluation at 6 months included alteration of symptoms, clinical appearance of the septum and complications. Results: Overall subjective symptoms improved in 75% of the septoeolumellar group and 87.5% of the high septal group (p > 0.2). The septum was noted to be straight postoperatively in 66.6% of the septocolumellar group and 93.5% of the high septal group (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the pattern of symptom scores between the two groups (p = 0.6503). There was a statistically significant difference in the alteration of sign scores between the two groups (p = 0.0162). Assessment of complications showed temporary numbness over the columella and tip in 8 cases (33.3%) in the septocolumellar group in contrast with no cases in the high septal group (p < 0.001) and 5 cases of recurrent dislocation of the caudal septum and 2 cases of columellar retraction In the septocolumellar group compared to no similar complications in the high septal group (p < 0.01). conclusions: The high septal hemitransfixion incisions provides more improved, although non-significant, results for alteration of symptoms but a significant improvement on objective assessment and a lower incidence of complications, particularly postoperative numbness, than the septocolumellar incision.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 197
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HEMITRANSFIXION APPROACH TO PROBLEMS OF NASAL SEPTUM
    WILLIAMS, RI
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1967, 77 (07): : 1116 - &
  • [2] Mini Endoscopic Septoplasty for High Localized Nasal Septum Deviation: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Comparison With Regular Septoplasty
    Liu, Jianfeng
    Zhao, Jianhui
    Wang, Yibei
    Zhao, Yu
    Han, Jun
    Yang, Dazhang
    Chen, Yihan
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 35 (06) : 1768 - 1771
  • [3] SEPTOPLASTY FOR CORRECTION OF DEVIATION OF NASAL SEPTUM
    STOVIN, JS
    AMA ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1953, 58 (02): : 168 - 171
  • [4] SEPTOPLASTY - RATIONAL SURGERY OF NASAL-SEPTUM
    EDWARDS, N
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1975, 89 (09): : 875 - 897
  • [5] Nasal septoplasty for correction of septal deviation in a foal
    Yarbrough, TB
    Carr, EA
    Snyder, JR
    Hornof, WJ
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 1997, 26 (04) : 340 - 345
  • [6] Suturing of the nasal septum after septoplasty, is it an effective alternative to nasal packing?
    Al-Raggad, Daifallah K.
    El-Jundi, Ali M.
    Al-Momani, Osama S.
    Al-Serhan, Mefleh M.
    Nawasrah, Omar O.
    Qhawi, Muafaq A.
    Husban, Adnan M.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (10) : 1534 - 1536
  • [7] Nasal septum histological changes in modelling septoplasty at rats
    Kastyro, I.
    Kostyaeva, M.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2020, 477 : S317 - S318
  • [8] The Role of Extracorporeal Septoplasty in Severely Deviated Nasal Septum
    Brajendra Baser
    D. K. Patel
    A. Mishra
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2019, 71 : 271 - 277
  • [9] The Role of Extracorporeal Septoplasty in Severely Deviated Nasal Septum
    Baser, Brajendra
    Patel, D. K.
    Mishra, A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2019, 71 (02) : 271 - 277
  • [10] Nasal septal suture technique versus nasal packing after septoplasty
    Yildirim, A
    Yasar, M
    Bebek, AI
    Canbay, E
    Kunt, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06): : 599 - 602