ASCPRO Recommendations for the Assessment of Fatigue as an Outcome in Clinical Trials

被引:102
|
作者
Barsevick, Andrea M. [1 ]
Cleeland, Charles S. [2 ]
Manning, Donald C. [3 ]
O'Mara, Ann M. [4 ]
Reeve, Bryce B. [4 ]
Scott, Jane A. [6 ]
Sloan, Jeff A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Shionogi USA Inc, Florham Pk, NJ USA
[4] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Grad Sch Med, Rochester, MN USA
[6] MAPI Values, Macclesfield, Cheshire, England
关键词
Cancer-related fatigue; self-report measures; clinical trials; patient-reported outcomes; CANCER-RELATED FATIGUE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY; PROPOSED DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; VALIDITY; DISEASE; SCALE; RELIABILITY; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.02.006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. Development of pharmacological and behavioral interventions for cancer-related fatigue (CRF) requires adequate measures of this symptom. A guidance document from the Food and Drug Administration offers criteria for the formulation and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials to support drug or device labeling claims. Methods. An independent working group, ASCPRO (Assessing Symptoms of Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes), has begun developing recommendations for the measurement of symptoms in oncology clinical trials. The recommendations of the Fatigue Task Force for measurement of CRF are presented here. Results. There was consensus that CRF could be measured effectively in clinical trials as the sensation of fatigue or tiredness, impact of fatigue/tiredness on usual functioning, or as both sensation and impact. The ASCPRO Fatigue Task Force constructed a definition and conceptual model to guide the measurement of CRF. ASCPRO recommendations do not endorse a specific fatigue measure but clarify how to evaluate and implement fatigue assessments in clinical studies. The selection of a CRF measure should be tailored to the goals of the research. Measurement issues related to various research environments were also discussed. Conclusions. There exist in the literature good measures of CRF for clinical trials, with strong evidence of clarity and comprehensibility to patients, content and construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change in conditions in which one would expect them to change (assay sensitivity), and sufficient evidence to establish guides for interpreting changes in scores. Direction for future research is discussed. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010;39:1086-1099. (C) 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1086 / 1099
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recommendations for the assessment of Therapeutic Outcome of Graves' ophthalmopathy in clinical trials
    Pinchera, A
    Wiersinga, WM
    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN GRAVES OPHTHALMOPATHY, 2000, : 81 - 87
  • [2] Pragmatic outcome assessment in clinical trials with children
    Castro-Fornieles, J.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 : S133 - S134
  • [3] Clinical outcome assessment in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments
    Patel, Kushang, V
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    Jensen, Mark P.
    Smith, Shannon M.
    Veasley, Christin
    Turk, Dennis C.
    PAIN REPORTS, 2021, 6 (01)
  • [4] Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
    Dworkin, RH
    Turk, DC
    Farrar, JT
    Haythornthwaite, JA
    Jensen, MP
    Katz, NP
    Kerns, RD
    Stucki, G
    Allen, RR
    Bellamy, N
    Carr, DB
    Chandler, J
    Cowan, P
    Dionne, R
    Galer, BS
    Hertz, S
    Jadad, AR
    Kramer, LD
    Manning, DC
    Martin, S
    McCormick, CG
    McDermott, MP
    McGrath, P
    Quessy, S
    Rappaport, BA
    Robbins, W
    Robinson, JP
    Rothman, M
    Royal, MA
    Simon, L
    Stauffer, JW
    Stein, W
    Tollett, J
    Wernicke, J
    Witter, J
    PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) : 9 - 19
  • [5] Outcome measurement in female sexual dysfunction clinical trials: Review and recommendations
    Althof, SE
    Rosen, RC
    DeRogatis, L
    Corty, E
    Quirk, F
    Symonds, T
    JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2005, 31 (02) : 153 - 166
  • [6] Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
    Turk, DC
    Dworkin, RH
    Allen, RR
    Bellamy, N
    Brandenburg, N
    Carr, DB
    Cleeland, C
    Dionne, R
    Farrar, JT
    Galer, BS
    Hewitt, DJ
    Jadad, AR
    Katz, NP
    Kramer, LD
    Manning, DC
    McCormick, CG
    McDermott, MP
    McGrath, P
    Quessy, S
    Rappaport, BA
    Robinson, JP
    Royal, MA
    Simon, L
    Stauffer, JW
    Stein, W
    Tollett, J
    Witter, J
    PAIN, 2003, 106 (03) : 337 - 345
  • [7] Clinical outcome measures in dementia with Lewy bodies trials: critique and recommendations
    Federico Rodriguez-Porcel
    Kathryn A. Wyman-Chick
    Carla Abdelnour Ruiz
    Jon B. Toledo
    Daniel Ferreira
    Prabitha Urwyler
    Rimona S. Weil
    Joseph Kane
    Andrea Pilotto
    Arvid Rongve
    Bradley Boeve
    John-Paul Taylor
    Ian McKeith
    Dag Aarsland
    Simon J. G. Lewis
    Translational Neurodegeneration, 11
  • [8] Clinical outcome measures in dementia with Lewy bodies trials: critique and recommendations
    Rodriguez-Porcel, Federico
    Wyman-Chick, Kathryn A.
    Abdelnour Ruiz, Carla
    Toledo, Jon B.
    Ferreira, Daniel
    Urwyler, Prabitha
    Weil, Rimona S.
    Kane, Joseph
    Pilotto, Andrea
    Rongve, Arvid
    Boeve, Bradley
    Taylor, John-Paul
    McKeith, Ian
    Aarsland, Dag
    Lewis, Simon J. G.
    TRANSLATIONAL NEURODEGENERATION, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [9] Recommendations for Self-Report Outcome Measures in Vulvodynia Clinical Trials
    Pukall, Caroline F.
    Bergeron, Sophie
    Brown, Candace
    Bachmann, Gloria
    Wesselmann, Ursula
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2017, 33 (08): : 756 - 765
  • [10] Research Outcomes and Recommendations for the Assessment of Progression in Cancer Clinical Trials
    Bushnell, Will
    Stone, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2013, 23 (05) : 949 - 950