Mechanistic approaches to volume of distribution predictions: Understanding the processes

被引:318
|
作者
Rodgers, Trudy [1 ]
Rowland, Malcolm [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Pharm, Ctr Appl Pharmacokinet Res, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
关键词
in silico modelling; pharmacokinetics; physicochemical properties; physiological model; tissue distribution;
D O I
10.1007/s11095-006-9210-3
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Purpose. To use recently developed mechanistic equations to predict tissue-to-plasma water partition coefficients (Kpus), apply these predictions to whole body unbound volume of distribution at steady state (Vu(ss)) determinations, and explain the differences in the extent of drug distribution both within and across the various compound classes. Materials and Methods. Vu(ss) values were predicted for 92 structurally diverse compounds in rats and 140 in humans by two approaches. The first approach incorporated Kpu values predicted for 13 tissues whereas the second was restricted to muscle. Results. The prediction accuracy was good for both approaches in rats and humans, with 64-78% and 82-92% of the predicted Vu(ss) values agreeing with in vivo data to within factors of +/- 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusion. Generic distribution processes were identified as lipid partitioning and dissolution where the former is higher for lipophilic unionised drugs. In addition, electrostatic interactions with acidic phospholipids can predominate for ionised bases when affinities (reflected by binding to constituents within blood) are high. For acidic drugs albumin binding dominates when plasma protein binding is high. This ability to explain drug distribution and link it to physicochemical properties can help guide the compound selection process.
引用
收藏
页码:918 / 933
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanistic Approaches to Volume of Distribution Predictions: Understanding the Processes
    Trudy Rodgers
    Malcolm Rowland
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2007, 24 : 918 - 933
  • [2] Comparing Mechanistic and Preclinical Predictions of Volume of Distribution on a Large Set of Drugs
    Chan, Rosa
    De Bruyn, Tom
    Wright, Matthew
    Broccatelli, Fabio
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 35 (04)
  • [3] Comparing Mechanistic and Preclinical Predictions of Volume of Distribution on a Large Set of Drugs
    Rosa Chan
    Tom De Bruyn
    Matthew Wright
    Fabio Broccatelli
    Pharmaceutical Research, 2018, 35
  • [4] Mechanistic understanding of in silico toxicity predictions
    Suarez, Diana
    Marchant, Carol A.
    Patel, Mukesh L.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 180 : S59 - S59
  • [5] COMPARING MECHANISTIC AND PRE-CLINICAL PREDICTIONS OF VOLUME OF DISTRIBUTION ON A LARGE SET OF DRUGS
    Chang, Rosa
    De Bruyn, Tom
    Wright, Matthew
    Broccatelli, Fabio
    DRUG METABOLISM AND PHARMACOKINETICS, 2018, 33 (01) : S65 - S65
  • [6] From prioritisation to understanding: mechanistic predictions of variant effects
    Slodkowicz, Greg
    Babu, M. Madan
    MOLECULAR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (12)
  • [7] Novel approaches for mechanistic understanding and predicting preeclampsia
    Kalkunte, Satyan
    Lai, Zhongbin
    Norris, Wendy E.
    Pietras, Linda A.
    Tewari, Neetu
    Boij, Roland
    Neubeck, Stefan
    Markert, Udo R.
    Sharma, Surendra
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 83 (1-2) : 134 - 138
  • [8] Towards a mechanistic understanding of cellular processes by cryoEM
    Nievergelt, Adrian Pascal
    Viar, Gonzalo Alvarez
    Pigino, Gaia
    CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 58 : 149 - 158
  • [9] Computational and theoretical approaches for mechanistic understanding: general discussion
    Bauer, Matthias
    Cadge, Jamie
    Davies, David
    Durand, Derek J.
    Eisenstein, Odile
    Ess, Daniel
    Fey, Natalie
    Gallarati, Simone
    George, Mike
    Hamilton, Alexander
    Harvey, Jeremy
    Hintermair, Ulrich
    Hulme, Alison N.
    Ishii, Youichi
    Jensen, Vidar R.
    Lloyd-Jones, Guy
    Love, Jennifer
    Lynam, Jason
    Macgregor, Stuart
    Marder, Todd B.
    Meijer, Evert Jan
    Morgan, Patrick
    Morris, Robert H.
    Mwansa, Joseph
    Odom, Aaron
    Perutz, Robin
    Reiher, Markus
    Schafer, Laurel
    Slattery, John
    Young, Tom
    FARADAY DISCUSSIONS, 2019, 220 : 464 - 488
  • [10] Advances in Mechanistic Understanding and Treatment Approaches to Tourette Syndrome
    Shprecher, David R.
    Kious, Brent
    Himle, Michael
    DISCOVERY MEDICINE, 2015, 20 (111) : 295 - 301