How Do Prior Gains and Losses Affect Subsequent Risk Taking? New Evidence from Individual-Level Horse Race Bets

被引:25
|
作者
Suhonen, Niko [1 ]
Saastamoinen, Jani [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Business Sch, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
关键词
break-even effect; horse race betting; house money effect; prospect theory; sequential risky decisions; HOUSE MONEY; RACETRACK BETTORS; BREAK-EVEN; DISPOSITION; MARKETS; BEHAVIOR; TAIWAN; LONG; PRICES; TRADE;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2016.2679
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Many empirical studies focusing on how prior outcomes affect subsequent risk taking report conclusions that appear mutually contradictory. While some studies document increased risk taking after gains and risk aversion after losses, others report the opposite. This paper contributes to this literature by investigating horse race bettors' sequential risky decisions using individual-level data. A horse race betting market is a laboratory-like environment and can be used to analyze behavioral patterns associated with decision making under risk. We find evidence for (i) the "house money effect" as bettors take riskier wagers after gains and mostly spend the money they have won; (ii) risk aversion after prior losses, which we label a "playing safe effect"; and (iii) a preference for breakeven. Contrary to the widely held conception in the empirical literature, our findings suggest that the "break-even effect" does not necessarily imply an increased preference for riskier bets because bettors may seek to break even with less risky wagers.
引用
收藏
页码:2797 / 2808
页数:12
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] How Do Capital Ratios Affect Bank Risk-Taking: New Evidence From the United States
    Abbas, Faisal
    Masood, Omar
    Ali, Shoaib
    Rizwan, Sohail
    SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (01):
  • [2] Prior Consequences and Subsequent Risk Taking: New Field Evidence from the Taiwan Futures Exchange
    Liu, Yu-Jane
    Tsai, Chih-Ling
    Wang, Ming-Chun
    Zhu, Ning
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 56 (04) : 606 - 620
  • [3] Do temperature shocks affect non-agriculture wages in Brazil? Evidence from individual-level panel data
    Oliveira, Jaqueline
    Palialol, Bruno
    Pereda, Paula
    ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2021, 26 (5-6) : 450 - 465
  • [4] How do board and ownership characteristics affect bank risk-taking? New evidence from sub-Saharan Africa
    Adu, Douglas A.
    JOURNAL OF BANKING REGULATION, 2024, 25 (03) : 209 - 233
  • [5] How Do Banks and Investment Funds Affect Family Risk-Taking? Evidence from the Financial Crisis
    Blanco-Alcantara, David
    Farinha, Jorge B.
    Jara-Bertin, Mauricio
    Lopez-de-Foronda, Oscar
    Santamaria-Mariscal, Marcos
    CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN BANKING: REGULATION, GOVERNANCE AND PERFORMANCE, 2018, : 255 - 278
  • [6] How do Personal Real Estate Transactions Affect Productivity and Risk Taking? Evidence from Professional Asset Managers
    Ling, David C.
    Lu, Yan
    Ray, Sugata
    REAL ESTATE ECONOMICS, 2021, 49 : 7 - 40
  • [7] How does capital buffer affect bank risk-taking? New evidence from China using quantile regression
    Jiang, Hai
    Zhang, Jinyi
    Sun, Chen
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2020, 60
  • [8] How Do Short-Term Cross-Border Capital Flows Affect Bank Risk-Taking? Evidence from China
    Chen, Rui
    Li, Jinye
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (05) : 1064 - 1076
  • [9] How do integrity level and economic punishment affect residents' willingness and behavior to separate household waste? New evidence from 1293 questionnaires in Jinan
    Liu, Chengqing
    Jing, Qianqian
    Cong, Jianhui
    Zhang, Weiqiang
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365