Comparing renal transplant patients' adherence to free cyclosporine and free tacrolimus immunosuppressant therapy

被引:30
|
作者
Chisholm, MA
Mulloy, LL
DiPiro, JT
机构
[1] Med Coll Georgia, UGA Clin Pharm Program, Sch Med, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Coll Pharm, Augusta, GA USA
[3] Med Coll Georgia, Sch Med, Sect Nephrol Hypertens & Transplantat Med, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
adherence; compliance; immunosuppressant therapy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2004.00301.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in renal transplant patients' (RTPs) adherence to cyclosporine compared to tacrolimus when medications are supplied free to the RTPs. Methods: Adult primary RTPs were included in the study if they received a renal transplant at the Medical College of Georgia (MCG) from June 1998 through August 2001 and received their first post-transplant year of follow-up care at MCG and free cyclosporine or free tacrolimus from the MCG outpatient pharmacy. Adherence was estimated by comparing each RTPs' tacrolimus or cyclosporine pharmacy refill records to the prescribed regimen for 12 months after transplant. Patients' cyclosporine and tacrolimus serum concentrations were used to validate adherence. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the fraction of RTPs remaining adherent and to compare the mean time RTPs were adherent in each group (cyclosporine vs. tacrolimus). Results: Thirty-three RTPs were included in the study, 25 (76%) received cyclosporine and eight received tacrolimus. The mean time to the first non-adherent month was 8 months post-transplant. At 12-months post-transplant, approximately 42% of the patients remained adherent. A greater percentage of the patients who received tacrolimus remained adherent compared with those who were taking cyclosporine (63% vs. 33%, p < 0.05). Approximately 75% of non-adherent patients were found to have subtarget drug concentrations, and only 24% of adherent patients had subtarget levels (p < 0.01). Conclusions: When provided free, patients are more adherent to tacrolimus than cyclosporine. Regardless of treatment, intensive efforts to increase adherence should be implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 82
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing renal transplant patients' adherence to free cyclosporine and free tacrolimus immunusuppressant therapy.
    Chisholm, MA
    McGinty, HE
    Mulloy, LL
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 24 (10): : 1468 - 1468
  • [2] Cyclosporine Versus Tacrolimus Maintenance Therapy in Renal Transplant
    Alghamdi, Saad
    Nabi, Zahid
    Skolnik, Edward
    Alkorbi, Lutfi
    Albaqumi, Mamdouh
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 9 (03) : 170 - 174
  • [3] Switch of immunosuppressant therapy from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in 30 liver transplant patients who developed hyperbilirubinemia
    Wang, Lu
    Zang, Yunjin
    Lin, Dongdong
    Lu, Shichun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (08): : 12918 - 12924
  • [4] Immunosuppressant therapy with tacrolimus and cyclosporine in lung transplant recipients and cytomegalovirus infection: a retrospective review
    Nogueiras Alvarez, R.
    Mazon Marana, I.
    Vega Gil, N.
    Vaca Recalde, G.
    Ortiz Petrosino, P.
    Mora Cuesta, V. M.
    Bautista Blazquez, A.
    Cuellar Gomez, D. Z.
    Sanchez Santiago, B.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 75 : S109 - S109
  • [5] Predicting renal transplant patients' adherence to immunosuppressant therapy and non-adherence associated graft rejection
    Chisholm, MA
    Williamson, GM
    Lance, CE
    Mulloy, LL
    McGinty, HE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 5 : 520 - 520
  • [6] Investigating barriers to immunosuppressant medication adherence in renal transplant patients
    Cossart, Amelia Rose
    Staatz, Christine Elizabeth
    Campbell, Scott Bryan
    Isbel, Nicole Maree
    Cottrell, William Neil
    NEPHROLOGY, 2019, 24 (01) : 102 - 110
  • [7] Patient factors associated with adherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients
    Chisholm, MA
    Lance, CE
    Mulloy, LL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2005, 62 (17) : 1775 - 1781
  • [8] A three arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with ATG induction therapy followed by either tacrolimus or cyclosporine in adult renal transplant recipients
    Charpentier, B
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (05) : 1625 - 1626
  • [9] TACROLIMUS OR CYCLOSPORINE: WHICH IS THE BETTER MAINTENANCE IMMUNOSUPPRESSANT FOR KIDNEY TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS?
    Seungyeup, Han
    Yaerim, Kim
    Sungbae, Park
    Hyungtae, Kim
    NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 19 : 113 - 113
  • [10] A three-arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with antithymocyte globulin induction therapy followed by tacrolimus or cyclosporine A in adult renal transplant recipients
    Charpentier, B
    Rostaing, L
    Berthoux, F
    Lang, P
    Civati, G
    Touraine, JL
    Squifflet, JP
    Vialtel, P
    Abramowicz, D
    Mourad, G
    Wolf, P
    Cassuto, E
    Moulin, B
    Rifle, G
    Pruna, A
    Merville, P
    Mignon, F
    Legendre, C
    Le Pogamp, P
    Lebranchu, Y
    Toupance, O
    de Ligny, BH
    Touchard, G
    Olmer, M
    Purgus, R
    Pouteil-Noble, C
    Glotz, D
    Bourbigot, B
    Leski, M
    Wauters, JP
    Kessler, M
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (06) : 844 - 851