Role of prenatal fetal echocardiography in the assessment of intrauterine growth restriction

被引:1
|
作者
Ali, Nesma Saied Ahmed Ahmed [1 ]
Ibrahim, Fatma Salah Eldeen Mohammed [1 ]
Shalaby, Nevine AbdelMonem Tawfik [1 ]
Hassan, Hend Galal Eldeen Mohamed Ali [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ain Shams Univ, Fac Med, Diagnost & Intervent Radiol Dept, Cairo, Egypt
[2] GALALA Univ, Fac Appl Hlth Sci Technol, Technol Radiol & Med Imaging Dept, Suez, Egypt
来源
关键词
Myocardial performance index; Foetal echocardiography; MPI; Perinatal outcome; Umbilical artery Doppler; Intrauterine growth-restricted foetus; MYOCARDIAL PERFORMANCE INDEX;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-022-00814-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is a common diagnosis in obstetrics and carries an increased risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity. Identification of IUGR is crucial because proper evaluation and management can result in a favourable outcome. Cardiovascular dysfunction and remodelling is a central feature of IUGR. The aim of the study was to use the left modified myocardial performance index (MPI), assess cardiac function in foetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) compared to healthy foetuses, and to connect the relationship between changes in MPI and perinatal outcome. A prospective study was conducted with 60 singleton foetuses between 24 and 40 weeks of gestation without foetal chromosomal abnormalities or major malformations, divided into two groups: 30 women with intrauterine growth restriction (30 women) and another 30 women with normal pregnancies (foetal growth pattern appropriate for gestational age and normal heart findings with normal sinus rhythm) who were matched for gestational age and served as the controls. Trans-abdominal ultrasound examination was done with 3.5-7-MHz curvilinear Probe (GE Medical US equipment). The umbilical arteries, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus all had blood flow velocity waveforms recorded. The pulsatility index (PI), cerebroplacental ratio (CPR), and Doppler velocimetry (DV) of the umbilical artery were all measured. All foetuses had their myocardial performance index assessed. Normal and abnormal umbilical artery(UA) Doppler, as well as normal and abnormal MCA Doppler, were used to examine the intrauterine growth restriction group. Foetal growth restrictions (FGR) foetuses' Mod-MPI values were compared to gestation-matched controls. The outcomes of the perinatal period were documented. Results: Intrauterine growth restriction foetuses with defective umbilical arteries Doppler had a substantially higher mean left myocardial performance index (mean 0.58 SD 0.093) than healthy foetuses (mean 0.45SD 0.070) (P 0.001). When compared to the control group, IUGR foetuses with abnormal left myocardial performance index had a significantly worse perinatal outcome and higher morbidity. When compared to intrauterine growth restriction foetuses with normal MPI, intrauterine growth restriction foetuses with defective left MPI had a significantly worse perinatal outcome (whether the UA Doppler was normal or abnormal). Based on the perinatal result, the foetal myocardial performance index was linked to the severity of foetal impairment in intrauterine growth restriction foetuses. Conclusion: MPI has the potential to be a useful technique for evaluating IUGR pregnancies and predicting neonatal outcome. Within the IUGR foetuses, MPI foetal echocardiographic characteristics can define a high-risk group.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Role of prenatal fetal echocardiography in the assessment of intrauterine growth restriction
    Nesma Saied Ahmed Ahmed Ali
    Fatma Salah Eldeen Mohammed Ibrahim
    Nevine AbdelMonem Tawfik Shalaby
    Hend Galal Eldeen Mohamed Ali Hassan
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53
  • [2] Echocardiography in intrauterine growth restriction
    Rasanen, J
    Debbs, RH
    Huhta, JC
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 40 (04): : 796 - 803
  • [3] Interest of chromosomal microarray analysis in the prenatal diagnosis of fetal intrauterine growth restriction
    Brun, Stephanie
    Pennamen, Perrine
    Mattuizzi, Aurelien
    Coatleven, Frederic
    Vuillaume, Marie Laure
    Lacombe, Didier
    Arveiler, Benoit
    Toutain, Jerome
    Rooryck, Caroline
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2018, 38 (13) : 1111 - 1119
  • [4] CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION AND ITS CORRELATION WITH FETAL OUTCOME
    Chourasia, Sudha
    Agarwal, Juhi
    Dudve, Monika
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2013, 2 (41): : 7944 - 7950
  • [5] Early but Not Late Prenatal Stress Causes Asymmetrical Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Fetal Sheep
    Frauendorf, V.
    Rakers, F.
    Rupprecht, S.
    Schubert, H.
    Schiffner, R.
    Schwab, M.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (03) : 269A - 269A
  • [6] Bias in the prenatal lung measurements in fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia with intrauterine growth restriction
    Aydin, Emrah
    Khanmammadova, Narmina
    Burns, Patricia
    Lim, Foong-Yen
    Habli, Mounira A.
    Peiro, Jose Luis
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (05) : 546 - 551
  • [7] Prenatal therapy for fetal growth restriction
    Figueroa, Reinaldo
    Maulik, Dev
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (02): : 308 - 319
  • [8] Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
    Hodges, Ryan
    Endo, Masayuki
    La Gerche, Andre
    Eixarch, Elisenda
    DeKoninck, Philip
    Ferferieva, Vessilina
    D'hooge, Jan
    Wallace, Euan M.
    Deprest, Jan
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2013, (76):
  • [9] Placental MRI in Intrauterine Fetal Growth Restriction
    Damodaram, M.
    Story, L.
    Eixarch, E.
    Patel, A.
    McGuinness, A.
    Allsop, J.
    Wyatt-Ashmead, J.
    Kumar, S.
    Rutherford, M.
    PLACENTA, 2010, 31 (06) : 491 - 498
  • [10] Intrauterine Intervention for the Treatment of Fetal Growth Restriction
    Spiroski, A-M.
    Oliver, M. H.
    Harding, J. E.
    Bloomfield, F. H.
    CURRENT PEDIATRIC REVIEWS, 2016, 12 (03) : 168 - 178