THE FUTURE OF DISPARATE IMPACT

被引：4
作者：
Primus, Richard [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Law, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源：
MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW | 2010年 / 108卷 / 08期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号：
0301 ;
摘要：
The Supreme Court's decision in Ricci v. De Stefano foregrounded the question of whether Title VII's disparate impact standard conflicts with equal protection. This Article shows that there are three ways to read Ricci, one of which is likely fatal to disparate impact doctrine but the other two of which are not.
引用
收藏
页码：1341 / 1387
页数：47
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Ayres I, 2007, TEX LAW REV, V85, P517
[2]  
BERMAN MN, 2004, CONSTITUTIONAL DECIS, V1, P48
[3]  
BREST P, 1976, FOREWORD DEFENSE ANT, V90, P4
[4]  
BRIAN T, 2001, BAYLOR L REV, V53, P289
[5]  
CAMINKER EH, 2001, U CIN L REV, V70, P25
[6]  
CARDWELL D, 2009, NY TIMES 0724, pA22
[7]  
CHRISTOPHER L, 1997, DEMOCRACY MAJORITARI, V50, P355
[8]  
CHRISTOPHER L, 1997, DEMOCRACY MAJORITARI, V50, P347
[9]  
Dworkin R, 2009, NEW YORK REV BOOKS, V56, P37
[10]  
Fallon RH, 2006, HARVARD LAW REV, V119, P1274
1234