Effect of electrode position on outcome of low-energy intracardiac cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

被引:39
|
作者
Alt, E
Schmitt, C
Ammer, R
Plewan, A
Evans, F
Pasquantonio, J
Ideker, T
Lehmann, G
Putter, K
Schomig, A
机构
[1] 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen, Universität München, Munich
[2] 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, 22 D-81675 München, Ismaninger Strasse
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 1997年 / 79卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00827-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the new method of low-energy, catheter-based intracardiac cardioversion in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) and to compare 2 different lead positions. Accordingly, we prospectively studied 80 consecutive patients with chronic AF (9.8 +/- 7.9 months) who were randomly assigned to undergo internal cardioversion either via defibrillation electrodes placed in the right atrium and coronary sinus (coronary sinus group) or via defibrillation electrodes placed in the right atrium and left pulmonary artery (pulmonary artery group). Intracardiac shocks were delivered by an external defibrillator synchronized to the QRS complex. After conversion, all patients were treated orally with sotalol (mean daily dose, 189 +/- 63 mg/day). For conversion to sinus rhythm, the overall mean energy requirement was 5.6 +/- 3.1 J. In the coronary sinus group, cardioversion was achieved in 35 of 38 patients at a mean energy level of 4.1 +/- 2.3 J (range 1.0 to 9.9), and in the pulmonary artery group in 39 of 42 patients with 7.2 +/- 3.1 J (range 2.5 to 14.8). Although there was no difference with regard to success rate, the energy differed significantly between the 2 groups (p < 0.01). Mean lead impedance was 56.4 +/- 7.0 Ohm and 54.6 +/- 8.4 Ohm, respectively (p = NS). No serious complications were observed in either lead group. At a mean followup of 14.2 +/- 7.0 months, 54% and 56%, respectively, of patients who had been converted successfully remained in sinus rhythm. Thus, low-energy biphasic shocks delivered between the right atrium and coronary sinus or pulmonary artery are equally effective for cardioversion of patients with chronic AF. The energy requirements for conversion from a pulmonary artery electrode position are higher than for the coronary sinus position. (C) 1997 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 625
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of treatment of atrial fibrillation with low-energy intracardiac cardioversion and conventional external cardioversion
    Alt, E
    Ammer, R
    Schmitt, C
    Evans, F
    Lehmann, G
    Pasquantonio, J
    Schomig, A
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 18 (11) : 1796 - 1804
  • [2] Low energy intracardiac cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Kulbertus, HE
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1997, 18 (11) : 1693 - 1695
  • [3] Low energy intracardiac cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation
    Santini, M
    Pandozi, C
    Toscano, S
    Castro, A
    Altamura, G
    Jesi, AP
    Gentilucci, G
    Villani, M
    Scianaro, MC
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (12): : 2641 - 2650
  • [4] Transoesophageal low-energy cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Santini, M
    Pandozi, C
    Castro, A
    Lamberti, F
    Loricchio, ML
    Ammirati, F
    Canale, G
    Calo, L
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 : 471 - 471
  • [5] Low energy intracardiac cardioversion after failed conventional external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Schmit, C
    Alt, E
    Plewan, A
    Ammer, R
    Leibig, M
    Karch, M
    Schomig, A
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 28 (04) : 994 - 999
  • [6] Pain threshold for low energy intracardiac cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with low or no sedation
    Ammer, R
    Alt, E
    Ayers, G
    Schmitt, C
    Pasquantonio, J
    Schmidt, M
    Putter, K
    Schomig, A
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (01): : 230 - 236
  • [7] LOW-ENERGY INTERNAL CARDIOVERSION FOR ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION RESISTANT TO EXTERNAL CARDIOVERSION
    BAKER, BM
    BOTTERON, GW
    SMITH, JM
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 6 (01) : 44 - 47
  • [8] A new approach for transesophageal low-energy cardioversion of atrial fibrillation
    Santini, M
    Pandozi, C
    Boggi, A
    Scianaro, MC
    Loricchio, ML
    Castro, A
    Lamberti, F
    Calò, L
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 22 : 558 - 558
  • [9] Transvenous Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation using Low-Energy Shocks
    Socas A.G.
    Ricard P.
    Taramasco V.
    Guenoun M.
    Lévy S.
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 1997, 1 (2) : 125 - 129
  • [10] A novel electrode placement strategy for low-energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: A simulation study
    Yang, Fei
    Sha, Qun
    Patterson, Robert P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 158 (01) : 149 - 152