Screening for Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Evidence Review

被引:189
|
作者
O'Connor, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Whitlock, Evelyn P.
Beil, Tracy L.
Gaynes, Bradley N.
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR 97227 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; LATE-LIFE DEPRESSION; DISSEMINATING QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; COMORBIDITY SURVEY REPLICATION; DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS; SERVICES-TASK-FORCE; MAJOR DEPRESSION; ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In primary care settings, prevalence estimates of major depressive disorder range from 5% to 13% in all adults, with lower estimates in those older than 55 years (6% to 9%). In 2002, the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening adults for depression in clinical practices that have systems to ensure accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and follow-up. Purpose: To conduct a targeted, updated systematic review for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force about the benefits and harms of screening adult patients for depression in a primary care setting, the benefits of depression treatment in older adults, and the harms of depression treatment with antidepressant medications. Data Sources: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PsycINFO (1998 to 2007), expert suggestions, and bibliographies of recent systematic reviews. Study Selection: Fair-to good-quality randomized clinical trials or controlled clinical trials; systematic reviews; meta-analyses; and large observational studies of serious adverse events and early discontinuation due to adverse effects. All studies were published in English. Data Extraction: Two investigators abstracted, critically appraised, and synthesized 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. Data Synthesis: Nine fair-or good-quality trials indicate that primary care depression screening and care management programs with staff assistance, such as case management or mental health specialist involvement, can increase depression response and remission. Benefit was not evident in screening programs without staff assistance in depression care. Seven regulatory reviews or meta-analyses and 3 large cohort studies indicate no increased risk for completed suicide deaths with antidepressant treatment. Risk for suicidal behaviors was increased in young adults (aged 18 to 29 years) who received antidepressants, particularly those who received paroxetine, but was reduced in older adults. Limitation: Examination of harms was limited to serious adverse events, and existing systematic reviews were primarily used. Additional studies published from 2007 to 2008 extend this review. Conclusion: Depression screening programs without substantial staff-assisted depression care supports are unlikely to improve depression outcomes. Close monitoring of all adult patients who initiate antidepressant treatment, particularly those younger than 30 years, is important both for safety and to ensure optimal treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / W265
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening for dysglycaemia in dental primary care practice settings: systematic review of the evidence
    Glurich, Ingrid
    Bartkowiak, Barbara
    Berg, Richard L.
    Acharya, Amit
    INTERNATIONAL DENTAL JOURNAL, 2018, 68 (06) : 369 - 377
  • [2] Screening for Child and Adolescent Depression in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    Williams, Selvi B.
    O'Connor, Elizabeth A.
    Eder, Michelle
    Whitlock, Evelyn P.
    PEDIATRICS, 2009, 123 (04) : E716 - E735
  • [3] Quality indicators for care of depression in primary care settings: a systematic review
    Yelena Petrosyan
    Yeva Sahakyan
    Jan M. Barnsley
    Kerry Kuluski
    Barbara Liu
    Walter P. Wodchis
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [4] Quality indicators for care of depression in primary care settings: a systematic review
    Petrosyan, Yelena
    Sahakyan, Yeva
    Barnsley, Jan M.
    Kuluski, Kerry
    Liu, Barbara
    Wodchis, Walter P.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [5] The psychometric properties of depression screening tools in primary healthcare settings: A systematic review
    El-Den, Sarira
    Chen, Timothy F.
    Gan, Yuh-Lin
    Wong, Eling
    O'Reilly, Claire L.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2018, 225 : 503 - 522
  • [6] Screening for Postpartum Depression in Well-Baby Care Settings: A Systematic Review
    Angarath I. van der Zee-van den Berg
    Magda M. Boere-Boonekamp
    Maarten J. IJzerman
    Riet M. E. Haasnoot-Smallegange
    Sijmen A. Reijneveld
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2017, 21 : 9 - 20
  • [7] Improving depression care: Systematic review of multifaceted interventions in primary care settings.
    Gerrity, MS
    Williams, JW
    Dobscha, SK
    Deveau, J
    Holsinger, T
    Gaynes, BN
    Moser, BK
    Dietrich, AJ
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 : 166 - 166
  • [8] Screening for Postpartum Depression in Well-Baby Care Settings: A Systematic Review
    van der Zee-van den Berg, Angarath I.
    Boere-Boonekamp, Magda M.
    IJzerman, Maarten J.
    Haasnoot-Smallegange, Riet M. E.
    Reijneveld, Sijmen A.
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2017, 21 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [9] Screening for depression in children and adolescents in primary care or non-mental health settings: a systematic review update
    Beck, Andrew
    Dryburgh, Nicole
    Bennett, Alexandria
    Shaver, Nicole
    Esmaeilisaraji, Leila
    Skidmore, Becky
    Patten, Scott
    Bragg, Heather
    Colman, Ian
    Goldfield, Gary S.
    Nicholls, Stuart Gordon
    Pajer, Kathleen
    Meeder, Robert
    Vasa, Priya
    Shea, Beverley J.
    Brouwers, Melissa
    Little, Julian
    Moher, David
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [10] Screening for depression in children and adolescents in primary care or non-mental health settings: a systematic review update
    Andrew Beck
    Nicole Dryburgh
    Alexandria Bennett
    Nicole Shaver
    Leila Esmaeilisaraji
    Becky Skidmore
    Scott Patten
    Heather Bragg
    Ian Colman
    Gary S. Goldfield
    Stuart Gordon Nicholls
    Kathleen Pajer
    Robert Meeder
    Priya Vasa
    Beverley J. Shea
    Melissa Brouwers
    Julian Little
    David Moher
    Systematic Reviews, 13