An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment

被引:90
|
作者
Bishop, JW
Scott, KD
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Dept Management, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Inst Human Resources & Ind Relat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037//0021-9010.85.3.439
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A model hypothesizing differential relationships among predictor variables and individual commitment to the organization and work team was tested. Data from 485 members of sewing teams supported the existence of differential relationships between predictors and organizational and team commitment, in particular, intersender conflict and satisfaction with coworkers were more strongly related to team commitment than to organizational commitment. Resource-related conflict and satisfaction with supervision were more strongly related to organizational commitment than to team commitment. Perceived task interdependence was strongly related to both commitment foci. Contrary to prediction, the relationships between perceived task interdependence and the ? commitment foci were not significantly different. Relationships with antecedent variables help explain how differential levels of commitment to the 2 foci may be formed. Indirect effects of exogenous variables are reported.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 450
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] BUILDING A SELF-DIRECTED WORK TEAM
    WELLINS, RS
    TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 46 (12): : 24 - 28
  • [2] Job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) - Does team commitment make a difference in self-directed teams?
    Foote, David A.
    Tang, Thomas Li-Ping
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2008, 46 (5-6) : 933 - 947
  • [3] TeamCheck a digital tool for self-directed team analysis and team development
    Antoni, Conny H.
    Bernardy, Valeria
    Niessen, Anna T.
    Mueller, Rebecca
    GIO-GRUPPE-INTERAKTION-ORGANISATION-ZEITSCHRIFT FUER ANGEWANDTE ORGANISATIONSPSYCHOLOGIE, 2025,
  • [4] How to empower that self-directed work team
    Haller, HS
    1996 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORK TEAMS, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 63 - 68
  • [5] Self-directed work groups and team competence
    Kauffeld, S
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 79 : 1 - 21
  • [6] Exploring the Impact of Self-Directed Team Learning in an Air Traffic Control Environment
    Maree, Jacobus G.
    Joubert, Christiaan G.
    van der Linde, Mike
    van Staden, Paul J.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY IN AFRICA, 2010, 20 (01) : 135 - 141
  • [7] Self-directed learning: Does it affect team performance?
    Smyth, Mike
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    RESUSCITATION, 2011, 82 (03) : 241 - 242
  • [8] IMPLEMENTATION OF A SELF-DIRECTED WORK TEAM IN A TRANSFUSION SERVICE
    SPARKS, L
    CLOUD, M
    SCHWEITER, A
    GRONE, L
    SODEMAN, T
    TRANSFUSION, 1995, 35 (10) : A19 - A19
  • [9] Team-auditing for controlling and improving the development and establishment of self-directed team work
    Stawowy, G
    HUMAN FACTORS IN ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT-VI, 1998, : 111 - 116
  • [10] Evidence of Self-Directed Learning on a High School Robotics Team
    Dolenc, Nathan R.
    Tai, Robert H.
    Mitchell, Claire
    JOURNAL OF YOUTH DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 9 (04):