Adjacent Segment Degeneration Versus Disease After Lumbar Spine Fusion for Degenerative Pathology A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of the Literature

被引:83
|
作者
Zhang, Chao [1 ]
Berven, Sigurd H. [2 ]
Fortin, Maryse [3 ]
Weber, Michael H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Navy Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Montreal Gen Hosp Site,1650 Cedar Ave,A5-169, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2016年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
adjacent segment degeneration; adjacent segment disease; lumbar fusion; incidence rate; risk factors; INTERBODY FUSION; DISC DEGENERATION; FOLLOW-UP; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; MOTION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; FIXATION; STENOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000000328
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: A systematic review. Objective: The purpose of this study was to review the published literature to estimate rates and identify risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) and adjacent segment disease (ASDis) after lumbar fusion. Summary of Background Data: Arthrodesis remains a common intervention for the surgical treatment of degenerative spinal disease. Clinical studies have demonstrated variability in the rates of adjacent segment pathology after lumbar fusion. Methods: This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Symptoms of ASDis were distinguished and defined by the need for a revision surgery procedure to address adjacent level pathology. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases. Extracted data included average patient age, average time to follow-up, type of intervention, potential risk factors, and ASDeg and ASDis incidence. Funnel and forest plots were used to describe heterogeneity and meta-regression to estimate pooled incidence of ASDeg and ASDis. Results: A total of 31 articles with 4206 patients were included for analysis. Combining all extractable data, the overall pooled incidence of ASDeg was 5.9% per year (95% CI, 4.8%, 7.2%), and ASDis was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.3%, 2.4%) per year. The incidence of ASDeg is higher with more motion segments. Sex, age, segmental sagittal alignment, fusion methods, and instrumentation were not associated with an increased risk of ASDeg or ASDis. Radiographic ASDeg did not show strong correlation with clinical outcomes. Conclusions: The prevalence of ASDeg and ASDis has been variably reported in the literature, and fusion length is the factor most significantly associated with adjacent segment pathology. In guiding surgical strategies to avoid adjacent segment pathology, limiting the number of levels fused may have a greater impact than changes in fusion strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 29
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cannizzaro, Delia
    Anania, Carla D.
    Safa, Adrian
    Zaed, Ismail
    Morenghi, Manuela
    Riva, Marco
    Tomei, Massimo
    Pessina, Federico
    Servadei, Franco
    Ortolina, Alessandro
    Fornari, Maurizio
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (06) : 740 - 749
  • [2] Prevalence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Spine Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Xia, Xiao-Peng
    Chen, Hong-Lin
    Cheng, Hong-Bin
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (07) : 597 - 608
  • [3] Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yavin, Daniel
    Casha, Steven
    Wiebe, Samuel
    Feasby, Thomas E.
    Clark, Callie
    Isaacs, Albert
    Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
    Hurlbert, R. John
    Quan, Hude
    Nataraj, Andrew
    Sutherland, Garnette R.
    Jette, Nathalie
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (05) : 701 - 714
  • [4] Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion surgery in treatment for degenerative lumbar disorders: a meta-analysis
    Tao Wang
    Wenyuan Ding
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [5] Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion surgery in treatment for degenerative lumbar disorders: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Tao
    Ding, Wenyuan
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [6] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yun-lu Wang
    Xi-yong Li
    Lun Liu
    Song-feng Li
    Peng-fei Han
    Xiao-dong Li
    Neurosurgical Review, 46
  • [7] Letter: Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Goel, Atul
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 81 (05) : E64 - E65
  • [8] Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis COMMENT
    Whitmore, Robert G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 80 (05) : 714 - 715
  • [9] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Li, Xi-yong
    Liu, Lun
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-fei
    Li, Xiao-dong
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [10] Adjacent segment degeneration and disease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preserving procedures: a meta-analysis
    Ren C.
    Song Y.
    Liu L.
    Xue Y.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (Suppl 1) : 245 - 253