Numerical simulation of innovative operation of blast furnace based on multi-fluid model

被引:26
|
作者
Chu Man-sheng [1 ]
Yang Xue-feng
Shen Feng-man
Yagi Jun-ichiro
Nogami, Hiroshi
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Inst Ferrous Met, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Sch Resource Proc & Bioengn, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[3] Tohoku Univ, Inst Multidisciplinary Res Adv Mat, Sendai, Miyagi 9808577, Japan
关键词
blast furnace; innovative ironmaking technology; multi-fluid blast furnace model;
D O I
10.1016/S1006-706X(06)60102-7
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
A multi-fluid blast furnace model was simply introduced and was used to simulate several innovative iron-making operations. The simulation results show that injecting hydrogen bearing materials, especially injecting natural gas and plastics, the hydrogen reduction is enhanced, and the furnace performance is improved simultaneously. Total heat input shows obvious decrease due to the decrease of heat consumption in direct reduction, solution loss and silicon transfer reactions. If carbon composite agglomerates are charged into the furnace, the temperature of thermal reserve zone will obviously decrease, and the reduction of iron-bearing burden materials will be retarded. However, the efficiency of blast furnace is improved just due to the decrease in heat requirements for solution loss, sinter reduction, and silicon transfer reactions, and less heat loss through top gas and furnace wall. Finally, the model is used to investigate the performance of blast furnace under the condition of top gas recycling together with plastics injection, cold oxygen blasting and carbon composite agglomerate charging. The lower furnace temperature, extremely accelerated reduction rate, drastically decreased CO2 emission and remarkably enhanced heat efficiency were obtained by using the innovative operations, and the blast furnace operation with superhigh efficiency can be realized.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 15
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Numerical Simulation of Innovative Operation of Blast Furnace Based on Multi-Fluid Model
    Man-sheng Chu
    Xue-feng Yang
    Feng-man Shen
    Jun-ichiro Yagi
    Hiroshi Nogami
    Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2006, 13 : 8 - 15
  • [3] Transient mathematical model of blast furnace based on multi-fluid concept
    Yagi, J
    Nogami, H
    Akiyama, T
    de Castro, JA
    MINPREX 2000: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MINERAL PROCESSING AND EXTRACTIVE METALLURGY, 2000, 2000 (05): : 519 - 526
  • [4] Development and application of multi-fluid blast furnace model
    School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110004, China
    不详
    不详
    Kang T'ieh, 2007, 12 (11-15):
  • [5] Transient mathematical model of blast furnace based on multi-fluid concept, with application to high PCI operation
    de Castro, JA
    Nogami, H
    Yagi, J
    ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 40 (07) : 637 - 646
  • [6] Numerical analysis on blast furnace operations by multi-dimensional mathematical model based on multi-fluid theory
    Yagi, Jun-ichiro
    Nogami, Hiroshi
    Chu, Mansheng
    SOHN INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ADVANCED PROCESSING OF METALS AND MATERIALS, VOL 7: INDUSTRIAL PRACTICE, 2006, : 283 - +
  • [7] Multi-fluid mathematical model for blast furnace and its solution
    Chu, Man-Sheng
    Guo, Xian-Zhen
    Shen, Feng-Man
    Yagi, Jun-Ichiro
    Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University, 2007, 28 (03): : 361 - 364
  • [8] Multi-fluid Mathematical Model For Blast Furnace and Its Parallel Solution
    Meng, Jiale
    Shao, Jianhua
    Zhao, Aimin
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY AND RESOURCE UTILIZATION II, 2014, 675-677 : 1463 - 1472
  • [9] A numerical method for bubbly flow simulation based on a multi-fluid model
    Tomiyama, A
    Shimada, N
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2001, 123 (04): : 510 - 516
  • [10] Numerical analysis of powder deposition in blast furnace by using multi-fluid process simulator
    Pintowantoro, S
    Nogami, H
    Yagi, J
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN MULTIPHASE FLOW II, 2004, 37 : 43 - 52