Measuring the impact of non-monetary incentives on facilitydelivery in rural Zambia: a clustered randomised controlled trial

被引:15
|
作者
Wang, P. [1 ]
Connor, A. L. [1 ]
Guo, E. [1 ]
Nambao, M. [2 ]
Chanda-Kapata, P. [3 ]
Lambo, N. [4 ]
Phiri, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] IDinsight, Lusaka, Zambia
[2] Minist Community Dev Mother & Child Hlth, Lusaka, Zambia
[3] Minist Hlth, Lusaka, Zambia
[4] UNICEF, Lusaka, Zambia
关键词
maternal health; newborn health; randomised controlled trial; incentives; institutional delivery; sante maternelle; sante neonatale; essai controle randomise; incitations; accouchement institutionnel; salud materna; salud del neonato; ensayo aleatorizado y controlado; incentivos; parto hospitalario; HEALTH; MORTALITY; PROGRAM; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.1111/tmi.12678
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
ObjectivesIn Zambia, only 56% of rural women deliver in a health facility, and improving facility delivery rates is a priority of the Zambian government. Mama kit' incentives - small packages of childcare items provided to mothers conditional on delivering their baby in a facility - may encourage facility delivery. This study measured the impact and cost-effectiveness of a US$4 mama kit on rural facility delivery rates in Zambia. MethodsA clustered randomised controlled trial was used to measure the impact of mama kits on facility delivery rates in thirty rural health facilities in Serenje and Chadiza districts. Facility-level antenatal care and delivery registers were used to measure the percentage of women attending antenatal care who delivered at a study facility during the intervention period. Results from the trial were then used to model the cost-effectiveness of mama kits at-scale in terms of cost per death averted. ResultsThe mama kits intervention resulted in a statistically significant increase in facility delivery rates. The multivariate logistic regression found that the mama kits intervention increased the odds of delivering at a facility by 63% (P-value<0.01, 95% CI: 29%, 106%), or an increase of 9.9 percentage points, yielding a cost-effectiveness of US$5183 per death averted. ConclusionsThis evaluation confirms that low-cost mama kits can be a cost-effective intervention to increase facility delivery rates in rural Zambia. Mama kits alone are unlikely to completely solve safe delivery challenges but should be embedded in larger maternal and child health programmes. ObjectifsEn Zambie, seulement 56% des femmes des zones rurales accouchent dans un etablissement de sante et l'amelioration des taux d'accouchements dans un etablissement est une priorite du gouvernement. Les incitations Mama Kits - petits paquets d'articles de puericulture offerts aux meres a la condition qu'elles accouchent dans un etablissement - peuvent encourager l'accouchement dans un etablissement. Cette etude a mesure l'impact et la rentabilite d'un Mama kit de 4 $US sur les taux d'accouchement dans un etablissement en zone rurale, en Zambie. MethodesUn essai controle randomise par grappes a ete utilise pour mesurer l'impact des Mama kits sur les taux d'accouchements dans un etablissement dans une trentaine de centres de sante ruraux dans les districts de Serenje et de Chadiza. Les registres au niveau des etablissements de soins prenatals et d'accouchements ont ete utilises pour determiner le pourcentage de femmes visitant les soins prenatals qui ont accouche dans un centre de l'etude au cours de la periode d'intervention. Les resultats de l'essai ont ensuite ete utilises pour modeliser le rapport cout-efficacite des Mama kits a l'echelle en termes de cout par deces evite. ResultatsL'intervention des Mama kits a entraine une augmentation statistiquement significative des taux d'accouchements dans un etablissement. La regression logistique multivariee a revele que l'intervention des Mama kits a augmente les chances d'accouchements dans un etablissement de 63% (p <0,01, IC95%: 29-106%), ou une augmentation de 9,9 points de pourcentage, ce qui donne un cout-efficacite de 5183 $US par deces evite. ConclusionsCette evaluation confirme que les Maman kits, de faible cout, peuvent representer une intervention rentable pour augmenter les taux d'accouchements dans un etablissement en zone rurale, en Zambie. Les Mama kits seuls sont peu susceptibles de resoudre completement les defis de l'accouchement sans danger, mais devraient etre integres dans de plus grands programmes de sante maternelle et infantile. ObjetivosEn Zambia, solo un 56% de las mujeres de zonas rurales dan a luz en centros sanitarios y el mejorar las tasas de partos hospitalarios es una prioridad para el gobierno de Zambia. Los incentivos Mama kit - pequenos paquetes de articulos de puericultura entregados a las madres con la condicion de dar a luz en un centro sanitario - podrian fomentar los partos hospitalarios. Este estudio se ha medido el impacto y el coste-efectividad de los Mama kit de US $4 sobre las tasas de partos hospitalarios en zonas rurales de Zambia. MetodosEnsayo aleatorizado, controlado en conglomerados, utilizado para medir el impacto de los Mama kits sobre la tasa de partos hospitalarios en treinta centros sanitarios rurales en los distritos de Serenje y Chadiza. Se utilizaron los registros de los centros sanitarios de atencion prenatal y de parto para medir el porcentaje de mujeres que recibian atencion prenatal que dieron a luz en un centro sanitario del estudio durante el periodo de intervencion. Los resultados del ensayo fueron utilizados para modelar a escala el coste-efectividad de los Mama kits en terminos de coste por muerte evitada. ResultadosLa intervencion con los Mama kits resulto en un aumento estadisticamente significativo de las tasas de partos en centros sanitarios. La regresion logistica multivariable determino que la intervencion con los Mama kits aumento la probabilidad de un parto hospitalario en un 63% (p < 0.01, IC 95%: 29%, 106%) o un aumento de 9.9 puntos porcentuales, con una coste-efectividad de US$5,183 por muerte evitada. ConclusionesEsta evaluacion confirma que los Mama kits de bajo coste pueden ser costo-efectivos para aumentar la tasa de partos hospitalarios en zonas rurales de Zambia. Es poco probable que los Mama kits por si solos resuelvan los retos del parto seguro, pero deberian incluirse dentro de programas mayores de salud materno-infantil.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 524
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cash, non-cash, or mix? Gender matters! The impact of monetary, non-monetary, and mixed incentives on performance
    Sittenthaler H.M.
    Mohnen A.
    Journal of Business Economics, 2020, 90 (8) : 1253 - 1284
  • [2] Effect of non-monetary incentives on uptake of couples' counselling and testing among clients attending mobile HIV services in rural Zimbabwe: a cluster-randomised trial
    Sibanda, Euphemia L.
    Tumushime, Mary
    Mufuka, Juliet
    Mavedzenge, Sue Napierala
    Gudukeya, Stephano
    Bautista-Arredondo, Sergio
    Hatzold, Karin
    Thirumurthy, Harsha
    McCoy, Sandra I.
    Padian, Nancy
    Copas, Andrew
    Cowan, Frances M.
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2017, 5 (09): : E907 - E915
  • [3] The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia—a randomised controlled trial
    Jakub Gajewski
    Mweene Cheelo
    Leon Bijlmakers
    John Kachimba
    Chiara Pittalis
    Ruairi Brugha
    Human Resources for Health, 17
  • [4] The contribution of non-physician clinicians to the provision of surgery in rural Zambia-a randomised controlled trial
    Gajewski, Jakub
    Cheelo, Mweene
    Bijlmakers, Leon
    Kachimba, John
    Pittalis, Chiara
    Brugha, Ruairi
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [5] Effects of team-based goals and non-monetary incentives on front-line health worker performance and maternal health behaviours: a cluster randomised controlled trial in Bihar, India
    Carmichael, Suzan L.
    Mehta, Kala
    Raheel, Hina
    Srikantiah, Sridhar
    Chaudhuri, Indrajit
    Trehan, Shamik
    Mohanty, Sunil
    Borkum, Evan
    Mahapatra, Tanmay
    Weng, Yingjie
    Kaimal, Rajani
    Sivasankaran, Anita
    Sridharan, Swetha
    Rotz, Dana
    Tarigopula, Usha Kiran
    Bhattacharya, Debarshi
    Atmavilas, Yamini
    Munar, Wolfgang
    Rangarajan, Anu
    Darmstadt, Gary L.
    Atmavilas, Y.
    Bhattacharya, D.
    Borkum, E.
    Carmichael, S. L.
    Chaudhuri, I
    Creanga, A.
    Darmstadt, G. L.
    Dutt, P.
    Irani, L.
    Kaimal, R.
    Mahapatra, T.
    Mehta, K. M.
    Mitra, R.
    Munar, W.
    Pepper, K.
    Raheel, H.
    Rangarajan, A.
    Saggurti, N.
    Sastry, P.
    Schooley, J.
    Shah, H.
    Srikantiah, S.
    Tarigopula, U. Kiran
    Ward, V
    Weng, Y.
    Wahid, S.
    Wilhelm, J.
    BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (04):
  • [6] Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives
    Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak
    Duflo, Esther
    Glennerster, Rachel
    Kothari, Dhruva
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 1291
  • [7] A randomised controlled trial on the impact of financial incentives on attendance at diabetic eye screening in London
    Judah, G.
    Valabhji, J.
    Gunn, L.
    Tyacke, P.
    Vlaev, I.
    King, D.
    King, D.
    Bicknell, C.
    Darzil, A.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2016, 59 : S65 - S65
  • [8] Monetary incentives in primary health care and effects on use and coverage of preventive health care interventions in rural Honduras: cluster randomised trial
    Morris, SS
    Flores, R
    Olinto, P
    Medina, JM
    LANCET, 2004, 364 (9450): : 2030 - 2037
  • [9] Impact of different unconditional monetary incentives on survey response rates in men with prostate cancer: a 2-arm randomised trial
    McIntosh, Megan
    Opozda, Melissa J.
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    Vincent, Andrew D.
    Galvao, Daniel A.
    Short, Camille E.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] Impact of different unconditional monetary incentives on survey response rates in men with prostate cancer: a 2-arm randomised trial
    Megan McIntosh
    Melissa J. Opozda
    Michael O’Callaghan
    Andrew D. Vincent
    Daniel A. Galvão
    Camille E. Short
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22