Comparison of surgical site and patient's history with a simplified risk score for the prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting

被引:92
|
作者
Apfel, CC
Kranke, P
Eberhart, LHJ
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Dept Anaesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Outcomes Res TM Inst, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[3] Univ Wurzburg, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-97080 Wurzburg, Germany
[4] Univ Marburg, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-35033 Marburg, Germany
关键词
postoperative nausea and vomiting;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03875.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Although site of surgery and previous occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting are often used to decide whether prophylactic anti-emetic drugs are indicated, the value of these predictors is unclear. We compared these two risk factors against a simplified four-factor risk score. We analysed data from 1566 adult inpatients who received balanced anaesthesia without prophylactic anti-emetics. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to quantify predictive properties. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 600 (38.3%) patients within 24 h. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 47% and 59% for surgical site; 47% and 70% for history of postoperative nausea and vomiting; and 58% and 70% for risk score with three or more factors. The area under the curve for surgical site was 0.53 (95% CI 0.50-0.56); that for patient's history was 0.58 (95% CI 0.56-0.61) while for risk score it was 0.68 (95% CI 0.66-0.71; P < 0.001). Prediction using surgical site or patient's history alone was poor while the simplified risk score provided clinically useful sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:1078 / 1082
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Apfel's simplified score may favourably predict the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Pierre, S
    Benais, H
    Pouymayou, J
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2002, 49 (03): : 237 - 242
  • [2] Prospective application of a simplified risk score to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Rüsch, D
    Eberhart, L
    Biedler, A
    Dethling, J
    Apfel, CC
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2005, 52 (05): : 478 - 484
  • [3] A simplified risk score for predicting postanesthetic nausea and vomiting
    Apfel, CC
    Laara, E
    Koivuranta, M
    Greim, CA
    Roewer, N
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (3A) : U115 - U115
  • [5] Interpretation of the four risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting in the Apfel simplified risk score: an analysis of published studies
    Darvall, Jai
    Handscombe, Michael
    Maat, Brooke
    So, Karena
    Suganthirakumar, Arune
    Leslie, Kate
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2021, 68 (07): : 1057 - 1063
  • [6] Nausea and vomiting: "the little big postoperative trouble" of the surgical patient
    Florescu, A.
    CHIRURGIA, 2009, 104 (02) : 127 - 129
  • [7] The effect of Apfel risk score and fasting times on postoperative nausea and vomiting Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting
    Sisman, Hamide
    Arslan, Sevban
    Gezer, Derya
    Akpolat, Refiye
    Alptekin, Dudu
    Gokce, Esma
    PERIOPERATIVE CARE AND OPERATING ROOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29
  • [8] Risk Assessment of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in the Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia Environment: Predictive Values of the Apfel's Simplified Risk Score for Identification of High-Risk Patients
    Kim, Shin Hyung
    Shin, Yang-Sik
    Oh, Young Jun
    Lee, Jeong Rim
    Chung, Sung Chan
    Choi, Yong Seon
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 54 (05) : 1273 - 1281
  • [9] Postoperative nausea and vomiting: risk factors, prediction tools, and algorithms
    Schlesinger, Tobias
    Meybohm, Patrick
    Kranke, Peter
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 36 (01) : 117 - 123
  • [10] Comparison of two instruments for assessing risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Kapoor, Rachna
    Hola, Eric T.
    Adamson, Robert T.
    Mathis, A. Scott
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2008, 65 (05) : 448 - 453