Welfare reform, fertility, and father involvement

被引:0
|
作者
McLanahan, SS [1 ]
Carlson, MJ
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Bendheim Thoman Ctr Res Child Wellbeing, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY USA
来源
FUTURE OF CHILDREN | 2002年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Recognizing that most poor families are single-parent families, the federal welfare reform law of 1996 emphasized the responsibility of both parents to support their children. In addition to strengthening the child support enforcement system, the law included several provisions designed to decrease childbearing outside of marriage and to promote two-parent families. This article focuses on the important role that fathers play in children's lives and how public policies have affected childbearing and father involvement. Key observations are: Compared with children living with both biological parents, children in father-absent families often have fewer economic and socioemotional resources from their parents, and do not fare as well on many outcome measures. Efforts to reduce the rising number of father-absent families by focusing on preventing unwanted pregnancy among unmarried women, especially teen girls, have met with some success; those programs seeking to alter adolescents' life opportunities in addition to providing education or family planning services appear to hold the most promise. Efforts to encourage greater father involvement by focusing almost exclusively on increasing absent parents' child support payments reap only minimal benefits for poor children because their absent parents often have few resources and little incentive to make support payments. To date, efforts to increase the emotional involvement of unmarried fathers with their children have produced disappointing results, but new research suggests that such programs can make a difference when targeting fathers at the time of a child's birth. Many children spend some time living away from their fathers, deprived of the financial and emotional resources they can provide. Because of the importance of fathers to child well-being, the authors conclude that new directions in research and public policies are needed to encourage greater father involvement across the Aide diversity of family arrangements in society today.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 165
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of welfare reform on children of adolescent mothers: Moderation by maternal depression, father involvement, and grandmother involvement
    Rosman, EA
    Yoshikawa, H
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2001, 32 (03) : 253 - 290
  • [2] Welfare reform and immigrant fertility
    Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes
    Susan L. Averett
    Cynthia A. Bansak
    Journal of Population Economics, 2016, 29 : 757 - 779
  • [3] Welfare reform and immigrant fertility
    Amuedo-Dorantes, Catalina
    Averett, Susan L.
    Bansak, Cynthia A.
    JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2016, 29 (03) : 757 - 779
  • [4] Did welfare reform influence the fertility of young teens?
    Lopoo, LM
    DeLeire, T
    JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 25 (02) : 275 - 298
  • [5] GOVERNOR REAGAN, WELFARE-REFORM, AND AFDC FERTILITY
    KEEFE, DE
    SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 1983, 57 (02) : 234 - 253
  • [6] Welfare recipients' involvement with child protective services after welfare reform
    Nam, Yunju
    Meezan, William
    Danziger, Sandra K.
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2006, 30 (11) : 1181 - 1199
  • [7] Social Norms about Father Involvement and Women's Fertility
    Lappegard, Trude
    Kornstad, Tom
    SOCIAL FORCES, 2020, 99 (01) : 398 - 423
  • [8] Father involvement in child welfare: Associations with changes in externalizing behavior
    Leon, Scott C.
    Bai, Grace Jhe
    Fuller, Anne K.
    CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 2016, 55 : 73 - 80
  • [9] Child welfare workers' sexism and beliefs about father involvement
    Brewsaugh, Katrina
    Masyn, Katherine E.
    Salloum, Alison
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2018, 89 : 132 - 144
  • [10] Does welfare reform affect fertility? Evidence from the UK
    Mike Brewer
    Anita Ratcliffe
    Sarah dSmith
    Journal of Population Economics, 2012, 25 : 245 - 266