Imaging modalities in pregnant cancer patients

被引:28
|
作者
Vandecaveye, Vincent [1 ,2 ]
Amant, Frederic [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Lecouvet, Frederic [7 ]
Van Calsteren, Kristel [3 ,8 ]
Dresen, Raphaela Carmen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Imaging & Pathol, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Oncol, Leuven, Belgium
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr Amsterdam, Ctr Gynecol Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hosp, Netherlands Canc Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Catholic Univ Louvain, UCLouvain, Inst Rech Expt & Clin IREC, Dept Radiol,Clin Univ St Luc, Brussels, Belgium
[8] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
radiology; interventional; neoplasm metastasis; neoplasms;
D O I
10.1136/ijgc-2020-001779
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Cancer during pregnancy is increasingly diagnosed due to the trend of delaying pregnancy to a later age and probably also because of increased use of non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy screening with incidental finding of maternal cancer. Pregnant women pose higher challenges in imaging, diagnosis, and staging of cancer. Physiological tissue changes related to pregnancy makes image interpretation more difficult. Moreover, uncertainty about the safety of imaging modalities, fear of (unnecessary) fetal radiation, and lack of standardized imaging protocols may result in underutilization of the necessary imaging tests resulting in suboptimal staging. Due to the absence of radiation exposure, ultrasound and MRI are obvious first-line imaging modalities for detailed locoregional disease assessment. MRI has the added advantage of a more reproducible comprehensive organ or body region assessment, the ability of distant staging through whole-body evaluation, and the combination of anatomical and functional information by diffusion-weighted imaging which obviates the need for a gadolinium-based contrast-agent. Imaging modalities with inherent radiation exposure such as CT and nuclear imaging should only be performed when the maternal benefit outweighs fetal risk. The cumulative radiation exposure should not exceed the fetal radiation threshold of 100 mGy. Imaging should only be performed when necessary for diagnosis and likely to guide or change management. Radiologists play an important role in the multidisciplinary team in order to select the most optimal imaging strategies that balance maternal benefit with fetal risk and that are most likely to guide treatment decisions. Our aim is to provide an overview of possibilities and concerns in current clinical applications and developments in the imaging of patients with cancer during pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 431
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imaging modalities and optimized imaging protocols in pregnant patients with cancer
    Adejolu, Margaret
    Shenoy-Bhangle, Anuradha S. S.
    McGettigan, Melissa
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (05) : 1579 - 1589
  • [2] Imaging modalities and optimized imaging protocols in pregnant patients with cancer
    Margaret Adejolu
    Anuradha S. Shenoy-Bhangle
    Melissa McGettigan
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 1579 - 1589
  • [3] Medical Imaging in Pregnancy: Safety, Appropriate Utilization, and Alternative Modalities for Imaging Pregnant Patients
    Albakri, Abdullah A.
    Alzahrani, Mohammed M.
    Alghamdi, Saeed H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [4] Imaging modalities for the staging of patients with colorectal cancer
    Bipat, S.
    Niekel, M. C.
    Comans, E. F. I.
    Nio, C. Y.
    Bemelman, W. A.
    Verhoef, C.
    Stoker, J.
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 70 (01): : 26 - 34
  • [5] Breast Imaging of the Pregnant and Lactating Patient: Imaging Modalities and Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer
    Vashi, Reena
    Hooley, Regina
    Butler, Reni
    Geisel, Jaime
    Philpotts, Liane
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (02) : 321 - 328
  • [6] Modalities for Imaging of Prostate Cancer
    Hou, A. H.
    Swanson, D.
    Barqawi, A. B.
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2009, 2009
  • [7] Imaging modalities for prostate cancer
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Barentsz, J. O.
    Heijmijnk, Stijn T. W. P. J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2009, 9 (07) : 923 - 937
  • [8] Novel imaging modalities in gynecologic cancer
    Rebecca A. Brooks
    Matthew A. Powell
    Current Oncology Reports, 2009, 11 : 466 - 472
  • [9] New imaging modalities in bladder cancer
    Mansi A. Saksena
    Douglas M. Dahl
    Mukesh G. Harisinghani
    World Journal of Urology, 2006, 24 : 473 - 480
  • [10] Radiologic Imaging Modalities for Colorectal Cancer
    Liu, Wen
    Zeng, An-Rong
    Tang, Han-Zhou
    Qiang, Jin-Wei
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (07) : 2792 - 2804