Strategic change and innovation reputation: Opening up the innovation process
被引:14
|
作者:
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Morgan, Todd
[1
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Obal, Michael
[2
]
Jewell, Robert D.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Kent State Univ, Dept Mkt, POB 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USAWestern Michigan Univ, Haworth Coll Business, Dept Management, 600 Mar Ave, Kalamazoo, MI 49006 USA
Jewell, Robert D.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Western Michigan Univ, Haworth Coll Business, Dept Management, 600 Mar Ave, Kalamazoo, MI 49006 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Manning Coll Business, Dept Mkt Entrepreneurship & Innovat, 1 Univ Ave, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[3] Kent State Univ, Dept Mkt, POB 5190, Kent, OH 44242 USA
As more firms begin to co-create new products with customers, a key question is, "Will opening the innovation process to customers always be beneficial?" This research examines how strategic change (e.g., closed to open innovation strategy) impacts the attitudes of the periphery of customers (i.e., customers not involved in the innovation process); and it further explores how a firm's innovation reputation can affect strategic change efforts. The results of two studies show that attitudes toward the firm improve when it moves from a closed to more open innovation strategy. This relationship is contingent on a firm's innovation reputation. When a firm has a high reputation for innovation, it should continue with its current strategy, whether open or closed. Conversely, having a low reputation for innovation indicates that any change of strategy is good in order to try to overcome negative perceptions of the firm's reputation.