Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Measures of Pain, Lung Function, Fatigue, and Functionality in Spinal Cord Injury

被引:12
|
作者
Sobreira, Margarida [1 ]
Almeida, Miguel P. [2 ,3 ]
Gomes, Ana [2 ]
Lucas, Marlene [1 ]
Oliveira, Ana [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Marques, Alda [6 ]
机构
[1] Santa Casa Misericordia Lisboa, Med & Rehabil Ctr Alcoitao, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hosp Vila Nova Gaia Espinho, Rehabil Ctr North, Porto, Portugal
[3] Univ Aveiro, Sch Hlth Sci, Inst Biomed, Lab3R Resp Res & Rehabil Lab, Aveiro, Portugal
[4] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] West Pk Healthcare Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Aveiro, Sch Hlth Sci, Lab3R Resp Res & Rehabil Lab, Campus Univ Santiago,Bldg 30, P-3810193 Aveiro, Portugal
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2021年 / 101卷 / 02期
关键词
Spinal Cord Injury; Minimal Clinically Important Difference; Peak Flow; Activities of Daily Living; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PULMONARY-FUNCTION; RESPIRATORY-FUNCTION; INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; SELF-REPORT; REHABILITATION; DISABILITY; MANAGEMENT; WORLDWIDE; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1093/ptj/pzaa210
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. The objective of this study was to determine theminimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), peak cough flow (PCF), peak expiratory flow (PEF), fatigue severity scale (FSS), and London chest activities of daily living scale (LCADL) in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCIs) after rehabilitation. Methods. Inpatients with SCI from 2 rehabilitation centers participating in a daily rehabilitation program were recruited. The NPRS, PCF, PEF, FSS, and LCADL were collected at baseline and discharge. The global rating of change scale was performed at discharge. MCIDs were calculated using anchor (linear regression, mean change, and receiver operating characteristic curves) and distribution-based methods (0.5 times the baseline SD, standard error of measurement, 1.96 times standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change) and pooled using arithmetic weighted mean. Results. Sixty inpatients with SCI (36 males; 54.5 [15.9] years) participated. On average their rehabilitation program lasted 7.3 (1.7) weeks. Pooled MCID estimates were 1.6 points for the NPRS, 69.8 L/min for the PCF, 77.4 L/min for the PEF, 1.1 points for the FSS, and 1.4 points for the LCADL. Conclusion. Established MCIDs for NPRS, PCF, PEF, FSS, and LCADL will help health professionals to interpret results and guide rehabilitation interventions in patients with SCI. Impact. Health professionals and researchers may now use -1.6 points for the NPRS, 69.8 L/min for the PCF, 77.4 L/min for the PEF, 1.1 points for the FSS, and 1.4 points for the LCADL to interpret if changes in pain, cough intensity, expiratory flow, fatigue and activities of daily living after rehabilitation of patients with SCI have been clinically relevant.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord injury (TASS)
    Sato, Hiroki
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Yoshikawa, Kenichi
    Chiba, Shuhei
    Mizukami, Masafumi
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2025, 48 (01): : 22 - 30
  • [2] Defining minimal clinically important differences in pain and disability outcomes of patients with chronic pain treated with spinal cord stimulation
    Sabourin, Shelby
    Tram, Justin
    Sheldon, Breanna L.
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 35 (02) : 243 - 250
  • [3] Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after spinal cord injury
    X Wu
    J Liu
    L G Tanadini
    D P Lammertse
    A R Blight
    John L K Kramer
    G Scivoletto
    L Jones
    S Kirshblum
    R Abel
    J Fawcett
    E Field-Fote
    J Guest
    B Levinson
    D Maier
    K Tansey
    N Weidner
    W G Tetzlaff
    T Hothorn
    A Curt
    J D Steeves
    Spinal Cord, 2015, 53 : 84 - 91
  • [4] Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after spinal cord injury
    Wu, X.
    Liu, J.
    Tanadini, L. G.
    Lammertse, D. P.
    Blight, A. R.
    Kramer, John L. K.
    Scivoletto, G.
    Jones, L.
    Kirshblum, S.
    Abel, R.
    Fawcett, J.
    Field-Fote, E.
    Guest, J.
    Levinson, B.
    Maier, D.
    Tansey, K.
    Weidner, N.
    Tetzlaff, W. G.
    Hothorn, T.
    Curt, A.
    Steeves, J. D.
    SPINAL CORD, 2015, 53 (02) : 84 - 91
  • [5] Minimal clinically important differences for outcome measures in COPD
    Make, Barry
    MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2008, 3 (01) : 39 - 41
  • [6] Minimal clinically important difference for measures of fatigue, cough and sputum
    Sobral Rebelo, Patricia Filipa
    Oliveira, Ana
    Paixao, Catia
    Marques, Alda
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2019, 54
  • [7] Minimal (clinically) important differences for the Fatigue Assessment Scale in sarcoidosis
    de Kleijn, Willemien P. E.
    De Vries, Jolanda
    Wijnen, Petal A. H. M.
    Drent, Marjolein
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2011, 105 (09) : 1388 - 1395
  • [8] Determining minimal clinically important differences in ecological momentary assessment measures of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis
    Sharma, Sonia
    Braley, Tiffany J.
    Alschuler, Kevin N.
    Ehde, Dawn M.
    Kratz, Anna L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [9] CORRELATION OF MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES RELATED TO SPINAL SURGERY
    Hanson-Hedblom, A.
    Jonsson, E.
    Fritzell, M.
    Hagg, O.
    Borgström, F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A537 - A537
  • [10] Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in fatigue measures for rheumatoid arthritis
    Kherani, RB
    Liang, MH
    Brant, R
    Pouchot, J
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 32 (07) : 1383 - 1384