Cost-Effectiveness of Daptomycin versus Vancomycin and Gentamicin for Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and/or Endocarditis

被引:29
|
作者
Bhavnani, S. M. [1 ]
Prakhya, A. [1 ]
Hammel, J. P. [1 ]
Ambrose, P. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ordway Res Inst, Inst Clin Pharmacodynam, Albany, NY USA
关键词
COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; IV; CEFTRIAXONE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1086/604710
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasingly common cause of bacteremia and endocarditis. The cost-effectiveness (CE) of daptomycin was compared with that of vancomycin-gentamicin in patients with MRSA bacteremia with or without endocarditis. Methods. With use of data from an open-label, randomized study comparing daptomycin with vancomycin-gentamicin in the aforementioned patient population, 3 cost strata were considered: (1) study drug acquisition (daptomycin, $0.37/mg; vancomycin, $7/g; and gentamicin, $0.12/mg); (2) stratum 1 plus the cost of therapy for treatment failures and adverse events, therapeutic drug monitoring, and preparation and administration of all medications; and (3) stratum 2 plus hospital bed costs. Drug costs were based on mean wholesale price, with other costs based on those for a typical community hospital. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as cost divided by proportion of successes. Sensitivity analyses were performed by varying the study drug cost. Results. Forty-five (20 successes) and 44 (14 successes) patients received daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin, respectively. The respective median cost-effectiveness ratios for daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin for each cost stratum were as follows: $4082 (range, $1062-$13,893) and $560 (range, $66-$1649) for stratum 1 (P < .001); $4582 (range, $1109-$21,882) and $1635 (range, $163-$33,444) for stratum 2 (P = .026); $23,639 (range, $6225-$141,132) and $26,073 (range, $5349-$187,287) for stratum 3 (P = .82). Sensitivity analyses indicated that if the cost of vancomycin was $0, strata 3 cost-effectiveness ratios did not differ ($23,639 and $25,668, respectively; P = .85). Similar results between groups were seen among patients with bacteremia. Conclusions. When all costs of therapy were considered, the cost-effectiveness of daptomycin and vancomycin-gentamicin was similar, even if the cost of vancomycin was $0.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 698
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF DAPTOMYCIN IN PATIENTS WITH INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS AND BACTEREMIA CAUSED BY METHICILLIN RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IN TURKEY
    Pala, M.
    Gol, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (07) : A550 - A550
  • [2] A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS ON THE USE OF DAPTOMYCIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF BACTEREMIA AND INFECTIVE ENDOCARDITIS IN PATIENTS WITH METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS INFECTION IN MEXICO
    Garcia-Contreras, F.
    Revelles, Martinez M.
    Briones, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (03) : A118 - A118
  • [3] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ESTIMATION OF DAPTOMYCIN VS VANCOMYCIN USE IN PATIENTS WITH BACTEREMIA AND/OR ENDOCARDITIS ON S. AUREUS RESISTANT TO METHICILLIN
    Paula Micone, P. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A714 - A714
  • [4] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis Is a Difficult Issue
    Westling, Katarina
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2009, 49 (05) : 699 - 701
  • [5] Comparative effectiveness of teicoplanin versus vancomycin in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia
    Hsieh, Hsing-Chun
    Lai, Edward Chia-Cheng
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 96 - 96
  • [6] Daptomycin versus vancomycin plus gentamicin for treatment of bacteraemia and endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus: subset analysis of patients infected with methicillin-resistant isolates
    Rehm, Susan J.
    Boucher, Helen
    Levine, Donald
    Campion, Marilyn
    Eisenstein, Barry I.
    Vigliani, Gloria A.
    Corey, G. Ralph
    Abrutyn, Elias
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 62 (06) : 1413 - 1421
  • [7] Daptomycin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
    Mangili, A
    Bica, I
    Snydman, DR
    Hamera, DH
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 40 (07) : 1058 - 1060
  • [8] Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Pujol, Miquel
    Miro, Jose-Maria
    Shaw, Evelyn
    Aguado, Jose-Maria
    San-Juan, Rafael
    Puig-Asensio, Mireia
    Pigrau, Carles
    Calbo, Esther
    Montejo, Miguel
    Rodriguez-Alvarez, Regino
    Garcia-Pais, Maria-Jose
    Pintado, Vicente
    Escudero-Sanchez, Rosa
    Lopez-Contreras, Joaquin
    Morata, Laura
    Montero, Milagros
    Andres, Marta
    Pasquau, Juan
    Arenas, Maria-del-Mar
    Padilla, Belen
    Murillas, Javier
    Jover-Saenz, Alfredo
    Lopez-Cortes, Luis-Eduardo
    Garcia-Pardo, Graciano
    Gasch, Oriol
    Videla, Sebastian
    Hereu, Pilar
    Tebe, Cristian
    Pallares, Natalia
    Sanllorente, Mireia
    Dominguez, Maria-Angeles
    Camara, Jordi
    Ferrer, Anna
    Padulles, Ariadna
    Cuervo, Guillermo
    Carratala, Jordi
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 72 (09) : 1517 - 1525
  • [9] Diminished vancomycin and daptomycin susceptibility during prolonged bacteremia with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Bennett, Jason W.
    Murray, Clinton K.
    Holmes, Robert L.
    Patterson, Jan E.
    Jorgensen, James H.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2008, 60 (04) : 437 - 440
  • [10] Effectiveness of Standard Daptomycin Dose in Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
    Nair, Rajeshwari
    Richardson, Kelly
    Livorsi, Daniel
    Goto, Michihiko
    Perencevich, Eli
    Alexander, Bruce
    Schweizer, Marin
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 : S207 - S208