A double-observer approach for estimating detection probability and abundance from point counts

被引:1
|
作者
Nichols, JD [1 ]
Hines, JE
Sauer, JR
Fallon, FW
Fallon, JE
Heglund, PJ
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Biol Resources Div, Patuxent Wildlife Res Ctr, Laurel, MD 20708 USA
[2] AScI Corp, Mclean, VA 22101 USA
[3] Univ Idaho, Dept Biol Sci, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
来源
AUK | 2000年 / 117卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1642/0004-8038(2000)117[0393:ADOAFE]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Although point counts are frequently used in ornithological studies, basic assumptions about detection probabilities often are untested. We apply a double-observer approach developed to estimate detection probabilities for aerial surveys (Cook and Jacobson 1979) to avian point counts. At each point count, a designated "primary" observer indicates to another ("secondary") observer all birds detected. The secondary observer records all detections of the primary observer as well as any birds not detected by the primary observer. Observers alternate primary and secondary roles during the course of the survey. The approach permits estimation of observer-specific detection probabilities and bird abundance. We developed a set of models that incorporate different assumptions about sources of variation (e.g. observer, bird species) in detection probability. Seventeen field trials were conducted, and models were fit to the resulting data using program SURVIV. Single-observer point counts generally miss varying proportions of the birds actually present, and observer and bird species were found to be relevant sources of variation in detection probabilities. Overall detection probabilities (probability of being detected by at least one of the two observers) estimated using the double-observer approach were very high (>0.95), yielding precise estimates of avian abundance. We consider problems with the approach and recommend possible solutions, including restriction of the approach to fixed-radius counts to reduce the effect of variation in the effective radius of detection among various observers and to provide a basis for using spatial sampling to estimate bird abundance on large areas of interest. We believe that most questions meriting the effort required to carry out point counts also merit-serious attempts to estimate detection probabilities associated with the counts. The double-observer approach is a method that can be used for this purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 408
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] AN UNRECONCILED DOUBLE-OBSERVER METHOD FOR ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND ABUNDANCE
    Riddle, Jason D.
    Pollock, Kenneth H.
    Simons, Theodore R.
    AUK, 2010, 127 (04): : 841 - 849
  • [2] Estimating detection probability and density from point-count surveys: A combination of distance and double-observer sampling
    Kissling, Michelle L.
    Garton, Edward O.
    AUK, 2006, 123 (03): : 735 - 752
  • [3] Double-observer approach to estimating egg mass abundance of pool-breeding amphibians
    Campbell Grant E.H.
    Jung R.E.
    Nichols J.D.
    Hines J.E.
    Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2005, 13 (3) : 305 - 320
  • [4] Comparison of two double-observer point-count approaches for estimating breeding bird abundance
    Forcey, Greg M.
    Anderson, James T.
    Ammer, Frank K.
    Whitmore, Robert C.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 70 (06): : 1674 - 1681
  • [5] A hierarchical dependent double-observer method for estimating waterfowl breeding pairs abundance from helicopters
    Roy, Christian
    Gilliland, Scott G.
    Reed, Eric T.
    WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2022, 2022 (01)
  • [6] A multispecies dependent double-observer model: A new method for estimating multispecies abundance
    Golding, Jessie D.
    Nowak, J. Joshua
    Dreitz, Victoria J.
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2017, 7 (10): : 3425 - 3435
  • [7] ESTIMATING THE ABUNDANCE AND HABITAT SELECTION OF CONSERVATION PRIORITY MARSH-DWELLING PASSERINES WITH A DOUBLE-OBSERVER APPROACH
    Jimenez, Jose
    Moreno-Opo, Ruben
    Carrasco, Manuel
    Feliu, Jordi
    ARDEOLA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2015, 62 (02): : 269 - 281
  • [8] Field comparison of removal and modified double-observer modeling for estimating detectability and abundance of birds
    Moore, JE
    Scheiman, DM
    Swihart, RK
    AUK, 2004, 121 (03): : 865 - 876
  • [9] Estimating detection probabilities from multiple-observer point counts
    Alldredge, Mathew W.
    Pollock, Kenneth H.
    Simons, Theodore R.
    AUK, 2006, 123 (04): : 1172 - 1182
  • [10] INCORPORATING DETECTABILITY INTO ANALYSES OF POPULATION TRENDS BASED ON HAWK COUNTS: A DOUBLE-OBSERVER APPROACH
    Berthiaume, Emilie
    Belisle, Marc
    Savard, Jean-Pierre
    CONDOR, 2009, 111 (01): : 43 - 58