Laboratory markers predicting severity of acute pancreatitis

被引:227
|
作者
Staubli, Sebastian Manuel [1 ]
Oertli, Daniel [1 ]
Nebiker, Christian Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Atlanta classification; biomarker; laboratory parameter; organ failure; prognostic factors; risk prediction; severity of pancreatitis; superinfection; TRYPSINOGEN ACTIVATION PEPTIDE; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE-BINDING PROTEIN; CARBOXYPEPTIDASE-B; CLINICAL-VALUE; ADHESION MOLECULE-1; ORGAN FAILURE; E-SELECTIN; POLYMORPHONUCLEAR ELASTASE; URINARY TRYPSINOGEN-2;
D O I
10.3109/10408363.2015.1051659
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease of highly variable severity, ranging from mild cases with low mortality to severe cases with high mortality. Numerous biomarkers have been studied as potential early predictors of the severity of this disease so that treatment can be optimally tailored to prevent complications. We aim to present and discuss the most relevant biomarkers for early severity assessment in AP that have been studied to date. We review the current literature on biomarkers that have been used to predict the severity in AP. C-reactive protein (CRP) is still considered to be the gold standard, with a cut-off value of 150 mg/ml 48 h after disease onset. Other markers, including procalcitonin (PCT) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) have been implemented in some hospitals, but are not used on a routine basis. Most other markers, including acute phase proteins (LBP, SAA, PTX3), cytokines (Il-8, TNF-a, MIF), activation peptides of pancreatic proteases (TAP, CAPAP, PLAP), antiproteases (AAT, a2M), adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, selectins, E-cadherin) and leukocyte-derived enzymes (PA2, PMN-E) have shown some promising results but have not been routinely implemented. Furthermore, new and interesting biomarkers (Copeptin, TRX-1, Ang-2, E-2) have shown good results, but more research is needed to determine if they could play a role in the future. Various reasons why new markers for disease severity have not been adopted in daily routine include low accuracy, cumbersome laboratory techniques and high cost. Despite these difficulties, research is still very active in finding new markers to predict the severity of AP.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 283
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Serum markers for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis
    Tadao Manabe
    Yuji Okada
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2004, 39 : 504 - 506
  • [2] Serum markers for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis
    Manabe, T
    Okada, Y
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 39 (05) : 504 - 506
  • [3] Markers for predicting severity and progression of acute pancreatitis
    Schutte, Kerstin
    Malfertheiner, Peter
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 22 (01) : 75 - 90
  • [4] Interleukins and inflammatory markers are useful in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis
    Ceranic, Davorin Branislav
    Zorman, Milan
    Skok, Pavel
    BOSNIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 20 (01) : 99 - 105
  • [5] Useful markers for predicting severity and monitoring progression of acute pancreatitis
    Werner, J
    Hartwig, W
    Uhl, W
    Müller, C
    Büchler, MW
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2003, 3 (02) : 115 - 127
  • [6] Clinical Significance of Inflammation Markers in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis
    Pian, Guangzhe
    Li, Hao
    Piao, Yongjun
    PANCREAS, 2021, 50 (02) : 201 - 205
  • [7] Markers of severity in acute pancreatitis
    Folch-Puy, Emma
    MEDICINA CLINICA, 2007, 128 (11): : 417 - 418
  • [8] Severity markers in acute pancreatitis
    S Jalkanen
    Critical Care, 19 (Suppl 1):
  • [9] Predicting severity of acute pancreatitis
    Rau B.M.
    Current Gastroenterology Reports, 2007, 9 (2) : 107 - 115
  • [10] Predicting Severity of Acute Pancreatitis
    Lee, Dong Wook
    Cho, Chang Min
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (06):