Arm vein conduit is superior to composite prosthetic-autogenous grafts in lower extremity revascularization

被引:45
|
作者
Faries, PL [1 ]
LoGerfo, FW [1 ]
Arora, S [1 ]
Pulling, MC [1 ]
Rohan, DI [1 ]
Akbari, CM [1 ]
Campbell, DR [1 ]
Gibbons, GW [1 ]
Pomposelli, FB [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg,Div Vasc Surg, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2000.106488
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Various alternative conduits have been used for lower extremity revascularization when an adequate ipsilateral greater saphenous vein is absent. This study compared the effectiveness of all-autogenous multisegment arm vein bypass grafts with that of composite grafts composed of combined prosthetic and autogenous conduits. Methods: One hundred fifty-three lower extremity revascularization procedures per formed between 1990 and 1998 were followed up prospectively using a computerized vascular registry. The grafts were composed of spliced arm vein segments with venovenostomy in 122 and of composite prosthetic-autogenous conduit in 31. Arm vein conduit was prepared by means of intraoperative angioscopy for valve lysis and identification of luminal abnormalities in 47.7% of cases. Results: Bypass graft configurations were as follows: femoropopliteal (12 arm vein, 2 composite); femorotibial (75 arm vein, 23 composite); femoropedal (14 arm vein, 6 composite), and popliteo-tibial/pedal (21 arm vein, 0 composite). The indication for surgery was limb salvage in 98% and disabling daudication in 2% of cases. The mean follow-up was 25.1 months (range, 1 month to 7.9 years). Overall survival at 4 years was 51%. Overall patency and limb salvage rates were as follows: primary patency, at 1 year-arm vein, 76.9% +/- 4.8%; composite, 59.5% +/- 9.6% (P = .02); at 3 years-arm vein, 70.0% +/- 8.0%; composite, 43.7% +/- 12.4% (P < .01); and at 5 years-arm vein, 53.8% +/- 8.7%; composite, 0%; secondary patency, at 1 year-arm vein, 77.5% +/- 4.6%; composite, 59.8% +/- 9.5% (P = .02); at 3 years-arm vein, 70.7% a 7.5%, composite, 44.9% +/- 13.1% (P < .01); at 5 years-arm vein, 57.7% +/- 8.0%; composite, 0%; limb salvage, at 1 year-arm vein, 89.3% +/- 3.7%; composite, 73.9% +/- 8.9% (P < .01); at 3 years-arm vein, 80.5% +/- 7.0%; composite, 49.6% +/- 14.3% (P < .01); at 5 years-arm vein, 76.3% +/- 9.9%; composite, 0%. Conclusion: In this study, multisegment autogenous arm vein was used successfully in a wide variety of lower extremity revascularization procedures and achieved good long-term patency and limb salvage rates, well in excess of those achieved with composite prosthetic-autogenous grafts. The use of autogenous conduit appears to offer superior results to composite conduit in lower extremity revascularization. The superior durability of arm vein makes it one of the alternative conduits of choice when an adequate greater saphenous vein is not available.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1126
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arm vein conduit is superior to composite prosthetic-autogenous grafts in lower extremity revascularization - Discussion
    LaMuraglia
    Faries
    Conte
    Darling
    Jackson
    Cambria
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 31 (06) : 1126 - 1127
  • [2] A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: All-autogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts
    Faries, PL
    LoGerfo, FW
    Arora, S
    Hook, S
    Pulling, MC
    Akbari, CM
    Campbell, DR
    Pomposelli, FB
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (06) : 1080 - 1087
  • [3] THE CURRENT STATUS OF PROSTHETIC-VEIN COMPOSITE GRAFTS FOR LOWER-EXTREMITY REVASCULARIZATION
    DEMASI, RJ
    SNYDER, SO
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1995, 75 (04) : 741 - 752
  • [4] A comparative study of alternative conduits for lower extremity revascularization: All-autogenous conduit versus prosthetic grafts - Discussion
    Chang, BB
    Faries, PL
    Ciocca, RG
    Dougherty, MJ
    Pappas, PJ
    Sidawy, AN
    Silva, MB
    Fox, D
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 32 (06) : 1088 - 1090
  • [5] Spliced Arm Vein Grafts Are a Durable Conduit for Lower Extremity Bypass
    McGinigle, Katharine L.
    Pascarella, Luigi
    Shortell, Cynthia K.
    Cox, Mitchell W.
    McCann, Richard L.
    Mureebe, Leila
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 29 (04) : 716 - 721
  • [6] Choice of autogenous conduit for lower extremity vein graft revisions
    Landry, GJ
    Moneta, GL
    Taylor, LM
    Edwards, JM
    Yeager, RA
    Porter, JM
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 36 (02) : 238 - 244
  • [7] CEPHALIC VEIN GRAFTS FOR LOWER-EXTREMITY REVASCULARIZATION
    SESTO, ME
    SULLIVAN, TM
    HERTZER, NR
    KRAJEWSKI, LP
    OHARA, PJ
    BEVEN, EG
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1992, 15 (03) : 543 - 549
  • [8] THE LESSER SAPHENOUS-VEIN - AUTOGENOUS TISSUE FOR LOWER-EXTREMITY REVASCULARIZATION
    WEAVER, FA
    BARLOW, CR
    EDWARDS, WH
    MULHERIN, JL
    JENKINS, JM
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1987, 5 (05) : 687 - 692
  • [9] COMPLICATIONS OF CEREBRAL REVASCULARIZATION WITH AUTOGENOUS VEIN GRAFTS
    DIAZ, FG
    PEARCE, J
    AUSMAN, JI
    NEUROSURGERY, 1985, 17 (02) : 271 - 276
  • [10] Arm vein conduit vs prosthetic graft in infrainguinal revascularization for critical leg ischemia
    Roddy, Sean P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 52 (03) : 794 - 795