Sustainability evaluation of the Great Wall of China using fuzzy set concepts by incorporating Leadership Energy and Environmental Design

被引:8
|
作者
Yang, Jin [1 ]
Tan, Fabian Hadipriono [1 ]
Tan, Adrian [1 ]
Parke, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Fuzzy sets; the Great Wall of China; leadership in energy and environmental design; LEED; sustainability; ancient construction;
D O I
10.1080/10286608.2017.1293662
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the sustainability performance of the ancient construction method and the service life during the Ming Dynasty on the Great Wall of China in Jinshanling. Jinshanling section of the Great Wall is located in Luanping County, approximately 150 km northeast of Beijing, China ["Beijing China to Jinshanling China." 2015. Google Maps, October 10. Accessed October 10, 2015]. To determine whether the Great Wall was sustainable during the time period, i.e. the Ming Dynasty, the authors use Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design guide and fuzzy set concepts (with the centroid method). The results of these methodologies demonstrate that the Great Wall of China in Jinshanling was fairly sustainable during the Ming Dynasty. After the conclusion of this paper, the authors hope to open up further research on whether the ancient construction methods from the Great Wall of China can be sustainable and used in today's construction industry.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 33
页数:33
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Performance evaluation of the current construction of the Great Wall of China in Jinshanling: using a fuzzy system
    Yang, Jin
    Tan, Fabian Hadipriono
    Tan, Adrian
    Parke, Michael
    CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2017, 34 (3-4) : 298 - 323
  • [2] Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) - A critical evaluation by LCA and recommendations for improvement
    Humbert, Sebastien
    Abeck, Heike
    Bali, Nishil
    Horvath, Arpad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2007, 12 : 46 - 57
  • [3] Fuzzy evaluation of product structural design using rough set theory
    Xu, Xiaohui
    Tong, Bingshu
    Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2006, 46 (11): : 1880 - 1883
  • [4] A prior pertinence evaluation using fuzzy set and Bayes theory for esophagus wall segmentation
    Debon, R
    Lim, PH
    Solaiman, B
    Robaszkiewicz, M
    Roux, C
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 23RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-4: BUILDING NEW BRIDGES AT THE FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING AND MEDICINE, 2001, 23 : 3844 - 3847
  • [5] USING FUZZY SET THEORY FOR WATER QUALITY EVALUATION OF WULIHU LAKE, CHINA
    Wang, Yuankun
    Sheng, Dong
    Wang, Dong
    Wu, Jichun
    UNCERTAINTY MODELING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 7 : 501 - 506
  • [6] Evaluation of product design concepts using grey-fuzzy information axiom
    Akay, Diyar
    Kulak, Osman
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREY SYSTEMS AND INTELLIGENT SERVICES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 1040 - 1045
  • [7] Evaluation of product design concepts using grey-fuzzy information axiom
    Akay, Diyar
    Kulak, Osman
    JOURNAL OF GREY SYSTEM, 2007, 19 (03): : 221 - 234
  • [8] Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Hybrid Energy System Using an Improved Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation Approach
    Zhang, Lihui
    Xin, He
    Kan, Zhinan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (05):
  • [9] Machine Learning for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design Credit Targeting: Project Attributes and Climate Analysis Toward Sustainability
    Mansouri, Ali
    Naghdi, Mohsen
    Erfani, Abdolmajid
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (06)
  • [10] Evaluation of energy sources based on sustainability factors using integrated fuzzy MCDM approach
    Saraswat, Santosh K.
    Digalwar, Abhijeet K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2021, 15 (01) : 267 - 290