Frustrated honeycomb-bilayer Heisenberg antiferromagnet: The spin-1/2 J1-J2-J1⊥ model

被引:18
|
作者
Bishop, R. F. [1 ]
Li, P. H. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Sch Phys & Astron, Schuster Bldg, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
COUPLED-CLUSTER METHOD; GROUND-STATE; QUANTUM MAGNETS; ELECTRON CORRELATIONS; J(1)-J(2) MODEL; S-EXPANSIONS; LATTICE; ORDER; PHASE; SPINS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.95.134414
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We use the coupled clustermethod to study the zero-temperature quantum phase diagram of the spin-1/2 J(1)-J(2)-J(1 boolean AND) model on the honeycomb bilayer lattice. In each layer, we include both nearest-neighbor and frustrating next nearest-neighbor antiferromagnetic exchange couplings, of strength J(1) > 0 and J(2) = kappa J(1) > 0, respectively. The two layers are coupled by an interlayer nearest-neighbor exchange, with coupling constant J(1)(<^>) = delta J(1) > 0. We calculate directly in the infinite-lattice limit both the ground-state energy per spin and the Neel magnetic order parameter, as well as the triplet spin gap. By implementing the method to very high orders of approximation we obtain an accurate estimate for the full boundary of the Neel phase in the kappa delta plane. For each value delta < delta(>)(c)(0) approximate to 1.70(5), we find an upper critical value kappa(c)(delta), such that Neel order is present for kappa < kappa(c)(delta). Conversely, for each value kappa < kappa(c)(0) approximate to 0.19(1), we find an upper critical value delta(>)(c)(kappa), such that Neel order persists for 0 < delta <delta(>)(c)(kappa). Most interestingly, for values of kappa in the range kappa(c)(0) < kappa < kappa(>) approximate to 0.215(2), we find a reentrant behavior such that Neel order exists only in the range delta(<)(c) (kappa) < delta < delta(>)(c). These latter upper and lower critical values coalesce when kappa = kappa(>), such that delta(<)(c) (kappa(>)) = delta(>)(c)(kappa(>)) approximate to 0.25(5).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transverse Magnetic Susceptibility of a Frustrated Spin-1/2 J1-J2-J1⊥ Heisenberg Antiferromagnet on a Bilayer Honeycomb Lattice
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Bishop, R. F.
    FIFTH CONFERENCE ON NUCLEI AND MESOSCOPIC PHYSICS, 2017, 1912
  • [2] Collinear antiferromagnetic phases of a frustrated spin-1/2 J1-J2-J1⊥ Heisenberg model on an AA-stacked bilayer honeycomb lattice
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Bishop, R. F.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS, 2019, 482 : 262 - 273
  • [3] A frustrated spin-1 J1-J2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet: An anisotropic planar pyrochlore model
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Bishop, R. F.
    Campbell, C. E.
    17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT PROGRESS IN MANY-BODY THEORIES (MBT17), 2014, 529
  • [4] The frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: J1-J2 model
    Bishop, R. F.
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Farnell, D. J. J.
    Campbell, C. E.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2012, 24 (23)
  • [5] Frustrated spin-1/2 Heisenberg magnet on a square-lattice bilayer: High-order study of the quantum critical behavior of the J1-J2-J1⊥ model
    Bishop, R. F.
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Goetze, O.
    Richter, J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2019, 100 (02)
  • [6] Spin-1/2 Heisenberg J1-J2 antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice
    Iqbal, Yasir
    Poilblanc, Didier
    Becca, Federico
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2015, 91 (02)
  • [7] Frustrated spin-1/2 J1-J2 isotropic XY model on the honeycomb lattice
    Bishop, R. F.
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Campbell, C. E.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2014, 89 (21):
  • [8] Ground-state phases of the spin-1 J1-J2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Bishop, R. F.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2016, 93 (21)
  • [9] Phase diagram of the spin-1/2 J1-J2 Heisenberg model on a honeycomb lattice
    Gong, Shou-Shu
    Sheng, D. N.
    Motrunich, Olexei I.
    Fisher, Matthew P. A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2013, 88 (16):
  • [10] Phase diagram of a frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: The J1-J2-J3 model
    Li, P. H. Y.
    Bishop, R. F.
    Farnell, D. J. J.
    Campbell, C. E.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2012, 86 (14):