Pricing Method for Big Data Knowledge Based on a Two-Part Tariff Pricing Scheme

被引:4
|
作者
Wu, Chuanrong [1 ]
Yin, Huayi [1 ]
Yang, Xiaoming [2 ]
Lu, Zhi [3 ]
McMurtrey, Mark E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Changsha Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Changsha 410114, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Nebraska, Coll Business Adm, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
[3] Univ Victoria, Peter B Gustavson Sch Business, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
[4] Univ Cent Arkansas, Coll Business, Conway, AR 72035 USA
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Big data knowledge; knowledge transaction; two-part tariff pricing; subscription pricing; pay-per-use pricing; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION; MODEL;
D O I
10.32604/iasc.2020.014961
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Nowadays big data knowledge is being bought and sold online for market research, new product development, or other business decisions, especially when customer demands and consumer preferences knowledge for new product development are needed. Previous studies have introduced two commonly used pricing schemes for big data knowledge transactions (e.g., cloud services): Subscription pricing and pay-per-use pricing from a big data knowledge provider's standpoint. However, few studies to date have investigated a two-part tariff pricing scheme for big data knowledge transactions, albeit this pricing scheme may increasingly attract the big data knowledge providers in this hyper-competitive market. Also, little research has been done from the perspective of the knowledge recipient firm which is an important and integral part of big data knowledge transactions. This study constructs a two-part tariff pricing decision model for big data knowledge transactions from the perspective of the knowledge recipient firms. The model is a more generalized pricing scheme decision model and can be used to compare the profitability of three pricing schemes: Subscription pricing, pay-per-use pricing, and two-part tariff pricing. It shows that the influence of free knowledge on new product development performance of knowledge recipient firms cannot be ignored, and the pay-per-use pricing scheme is the best solution for knowledge recipient firms.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1184
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On a Variation of Two-Part Tariff Pricing of Services: A Data-Driven Approach
    Perakis, Georgia
    Thraves, Charles
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 24 (03) : 1369 - 1387
  • [2] A NOTE ON THE ECONOMICS OF PASS-THROUGH WITH TWO-PART TARIFF PRICING
    Rothman, Dov
    JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS, 2015, 11 (02) : 401 - 408
  • [3] The Robustness of Warranty: Wholesale Pricing Contract vs Two-part Tariff
    Tian, Houping
    Yan, Qingqing
    Liu, Changxian
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM), 2018, : 928 - 932
  • [4] Two-part pricing with costly arbitrage
    McManus, B
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2001, 68 (02) : 369 - 386
  • [5] Two-part pricing under competition
    Tian, XW
    Ni, DB
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2004, : 704 - 709
  • [6] The Role of Data Cap in Optimal Two-Part Network Pricing
    Wang, Xin
    Ma, Richard T. B.
    Xu, Yinlong
    IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING, 2017, 25 (06) : 3602 - 3615
  • [7] The Role of Data Cap in Optimal Two-part Network Pricing
    Wang, Xin
    Ma, Richard T. B.
    Xu, Yinlong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB (WWW 2015), 2015, : 1220 - 1230
  • [8] Pricing the razor: A note on two-part tariffs
    Schmalensee, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2015, 42 : 19 - 22
  • [9] Applications Of Two-Part Pricing In Pharmaceutical Markets
    Civan, Abdulkadir
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2008, 27 (06) : 1749 - 1750
  • [10] Optimal Pricing Strategies and Information Rent in the Distribution Channel by Using Two-Part Tariff Contract
    Tian Hou-ping
    Shi Xiao-min
    Liu Chang-xian
    2016 23RD ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, VOLS. I AND II, 2016, : 516 - 521