Testing normality: a GMM approach

被引:70
|
作者
Bontemps, C [1 ]
Meddahi, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, CIREQ, CIRANO, Dept Sci Econ, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Stein equation; Hermite polynomials; parameter uncertainty; HAC;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.02.014
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper, we consider testing marginal normal distributional assumptions. More precisely, we propose tests based on moment conditions implied by normality. These moment conditions are known as the Stein (Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematics, Statistics and Probability, Vol. 2, pp. 583-602) equations. They coincide with the first class of moment conditions derived by Hansen and Scheinkman (Econometrica 63 (1995) 767) when the random variable of interest is a scalar diffusion. Among other examples, Stein equation implies that the mean of Hermite polynomials is zero. The GMM approach we adopt is well suited for two reasons. It allows us to study in detail the parameter uncertainty problem, i.e., when the tests depend on unknown parameters that have to be estimated. In particular, we characterize the moment conditions that are robust against parameter uncertainty and show that Hermite polynomials are special examples. This is the main contribution of the paper. The second reason for using GMM is that our tests are also valid for time series. In this case, we adopt a heteroskedastic-autocorrelation-consistent approach to estimate the weighting matrix when the dependence of the data is unspecified. We also make a theoretical comparison of our tests with Jarque and Bera (Econom. Lett. 6 (1980) 255) and OPG regression tests of Davidson and MacKinnon (Estimation and Inference in Econometrics, Oxford University Press, Oxford). Finite sample properties of our tests are derived through a comprehensive Monte Carlo study. Finally, two applications to GARCH and realized volatility models are presented. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 186
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A large deviation approach to normality testing
    Sigut, J
    Piñeiro, J
    Moreno, L
    Estevez, J
    Aguilar, R
    Marichal, R
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2005, 49 (03) : 741 - 756
  • [2] A neural network approach to normality testing
    Department of Physics, Electronics and Systems, University of la Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
    Intell. Data Anal., 2006, 6 (509-519):
  • [3] A neural network approach to normality testing
    Sigut, J.
    Pineiro, J.
    Estevez, J.
    Toledo, P.
    INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS, 2006, 10 (06) : 509 - 519
  • [4] PRELIMINARY-REPORT ON AN APPROACH TO TESTING FOR NORMALITY
    MONHOR, D
    JOURNAL OF GEODYNAMICS, 1993, 18 (1-4) : 85 - 90
  • [5] Testing Interval Forecasts: A GMM-Based Approach
    Dumitrescu, Elena-Ivona
    Hurlin, Christophe
    Madkour, Jaouad
    JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2013, 32 (02) : 97 - 110
  • [6] Testing the normality of errors in regression models with a forward approach
    Coin, Daniele
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2006, 92 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [7] Quantile-Zone Based Approach to Normality Testing
    Avdovi, Atif
    Jevremovi, Vesna
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [8] Testing normality
    Klauenberg, Katy
    Elster, Clemens
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2019, 86 (12) : 773 - 783
  • [9] Testing for unit roots in panel data using a GMM approach
    Breitung, J
    STATISTICAL PAPERS, 1997, 38 (03) : 253 - 269
  • [10] TESTING FOR NORMALITY
    GEARY, RC
    BIOMETRIKA, 1947, 34 (3-4) : 209 - 242