Threshold of Toxicological Concern-An Update for Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens

被引:8
|
作者
Batke, Monika [1 ]
Afrapoli, Fatemeh Moradi [1 ]
Kellner, Rupert [1 ]
Rathman, James F. [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Chihae [2 ,3 ]
Cronin, Mark T. D. [4 ]
Escher, Sylvia E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Toxicol & Expt Med ITEM, Hannover, Germany
[2] Altamira LLC, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Mol Networks GmbH, Nurnberg, Germany
[4] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Pharm & Biomol Sci, Liverpool, England
来源
FRONTIERS IN TOXICOLOGY | 2021年 / 3卷
关键词
DNA-reactive mutagenic; genotoxic; threshold; TTC; benchmark dose; risk assessment; INHALATION TTC VALUES; SUBSTANCES; DATABASE; RELEVANCE; GUIDANCE; CANCER; US;
D O I
10.3389/ftox.2021.688321
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
The Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) concept can be applied to organic compounds with the known chemical structure to derive a threshold for exposure, below which a toxic effect on human health by the compound is not expected. The TTC concept distinguishes between carcinogens that may act as genotoxic and non-genotoxic compounds. A positive prediction of a genotoxic mode of action, either by structural alerts or experimental data, leads to the application of the threshold value for genotoxic compounds. Non-genotoxic substances are assigned to the TTC value of their respective Cramer class, even though it is recognized that they could test positive in a rodent cancer bioassay. This study investigated the applicability of the Cramer classes specifically to provide adequate protection for non-genotoxic carcinogens. For this purpose, benchmark dose levels based on tumor incidence were compared with no observed effect levels (NOELs) derived from non-, pre- or neoplastic lesions. One key aspect was the categorization of compounds as non-genotoxic carcinogens. The recently finished CEFIC LRI project B18 classified the carcinogens of the Carcinogenicity Potency DataBase (CPDB) as either non-genotoxic or genotoxic compounds based on experimental or in silico data. A detailed consistency check resulted in a dataset of 137 non-genotoxic organic compounds. For these 137 compounds, NOEL values were derived from high quality animal studies with oral exposure and chronic duration using well-known repositories, such as RepDose, ToxRef, and COSMOS DB. Further, an effective tumor dose (ETD10) was calculated and compared with the lower confidence limit on benchmark dose levels (BMDL10) derived by model averaging. Comparative analysis of NOEL/EDT10/BMDL10 values showed that potentially bioaccumulative compounds in humans, as well as steroids, which both belong to the exclusion categories, occur predominantly in the region of the fifth percentiles of the distributions. Excluding these 25 compounds resulted in significantly higher but comparable fifth percentile chronic NOEL and BMDL10 values, while the fifth percentile EDT10 value was slightly higher but not statistically significant. The comparison of the obtained distributions of NOELs with the existing Cramer classes and their derived TTC values supports the application of Cramer class thresholds to all non-genotoxic compounds, such as non-genotoxic carcinogens.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thresholds of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens
    Nohmi T.
    Toxicological Research, 2018, 34 (4) : 281 - 290
  • [2] THE SEPARATE IDENTITIES OF GENOTOXIC AND NON-GENOTOXIC CARCINOGENS
    ASHBY, J
    MUTAGENESIS, 1988, 3 (04) : 365 - 366
  • [3] Recombination as indicator for genotoxic and "non-genotoxic" environmental carcinogens
    Fahrig, R
    BIOMONITORS AND BIOMARKERS AS INDICATORS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE 2: A HANDBOOK, 2001, 56 : 201 - 219
  • [4] Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification
    H. Kalkhof
    M. Herzler
    R. Stahlmann
    U. Gundert-Remy
    Archives of Toxicology, 2012, 86 : 17 - 25
  • [5] Threshold of toxicological concern values for non-genotoxic effects in industrial chemicals: re-evaluation of the Cramer classification
    Kalkhof, H.
    Herzler, M.
    Stahlmann, R.
    Gundert-Remy, U.
    ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2012, 86 (01) : 17 - 25
  • [6] The use of apoptosis to screen for non-genotoxic carcinogens
    O'Neill, CJ
    Brunori, G
    Bugelski, PJ
    Lord, PG
    Lyon, JJ
    Holder, JC
    TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 168 (01) : 100 - 101
  • [7] Predictive toxicogenomics approaches to non-genotoxic carcinogens
    McMillian, Michael
    Nie, Alex
    Raghavan, Nandini
    Amaratunga, Dhammika
    Lord, Peter
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 180 : S14 - S14
  • [8] An integrated in vitro carcinogenicity test that distinguishes between genotoxic carcinogens, non-genotoxic carcinogens, and non-carcinogens
    Chapman, Katherine E.
    Shah, Ume-Kulsoom
    Fletcher, Jessica F.
    Johnson, George E.
    Doak, Shareen H.
    Jenkins, Gareth J. S.
    MUTAGENESIS, 2024, 39 (02) : 69 - 77
  • [9] Differentiation of genotoxic/non-genotoxic carcinogens by gene expression profiling
    Kim, Loo Hwan
    Yum, Young Na
    Kang, Jin Seok
    Lee, Woo Sun
    Lee, Eun Mi
    Koo, Ye Mo
    Han, Euisik
    Kim, Seung Hee
    Park, Sue Nie
    MOLECULAR & CELLULAR TOXICOLOGY, 2007, 3 (04) : 53 - 53
  • [10] Is current risk assessment of non-genotoxic carcinogens protective?
    Braakhuis, H. M.
    Slob, W.
    Olthof, E. D.
    Wolterink, G.
    Zwart, E. P.
    Gremmer, E. R.
    Rorije, E.
    van Benthem, J.
    Woutersen, R.
    van der Laan, J. W.
    Luijten, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS, 2018, 59 : 108 - 108