The promise (and pitfalls) of ICT for agriculture initiatives

被引:205
|
作者
Aker, Jenny C. [1 ,2 ]
Ghosh, Ishita [3 ]
Burrell, Jenna [3 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] IFPRI, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Informat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Information technology; agriculture; impact evaluation; MOBILE PHONES; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; MARKET PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL NETWORKS; INFORMATION; TRUST; POWER; ACCESS; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12301
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
The widespread growth of information and telecommunication technologies (ICTs) in rural areas of developing countries offers new opportunities to provide more timely and low-cost information services to farmers, as well as assist in coordinating agricultural agents. Over the past decade, the number of public and private sector initiatives in this space has increased substantially, with over 140 deployments worldwide in 2015. While there is substantial potential for such services to address farmers' and traders' information and credit market constraints, economic research suggests that the impacts of such services on agricultural adoption, behavior and welfare is mixed. While this can, in part, be explained by the degree of the information asymmetry and the presence of other market failures in different contexts, research from other disciplines provides additional insights into these findings. In particular, work in the domain of human-computer interaction (HCI) focuses heavily on users' interaction and experience with a given technology, thus explaining why users may not fully engage with ICT-based agricultural interfaces. Furthermore, sociological and anthropological approaches study the provision of information and trust and how these may be altered by ICT platforms. Drawing upon these disciplines, we suggest that future ICT for agriculture initiatives should first seek to better understand the information and complementary market failures in a given context, in order to better understand whether information is a binding constraint. Second, even if information is missing, the information services provided should be of high quality and from a trusted source, which can be a challenge with some ICT platforms. Finally, such services should be delivered via platforms that build upon local ICT access and usage, paying particular attention to the gender digital divide.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 48
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiple initiatives, multiple challenges: The promise and pitfalls of implementing data
    Hubbard, Lea
    Datnow, Amanda
    Pruyn, Laura
    STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2014, 42 : 54 - 62
  • [2] Content development and management processes of ICT initiatives in Indian agriculture
    Glendenning, Claire J.
    Ficarelli, Pier Paolo
    INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 27 (04) : 301 - 314
  • [3] The Promise and Pitfalls: A Literature Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Assistant in ICT Education
    Chugh, Ritesh
    Turnbull, Darren
    Morshed, Ahsan
    Sabrina, Fariza
    Azad, Salahuddin
    Mamunur, Rashid Md
    Kaisar, Shahriar
    Subramani, Sudha
    COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2025, 33 (02)
  • [4] ICT and agriculture
    Madhura Swaminathan
    M. S. Swaminathan
    CSI Transactions on ICT, 2018, 6 (3-4) : 227 - 229
  • [5] The promise and pitfalls of biopharming
    Baylis, Alan
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2008, 2 (05): : 383 - 384
  • [6] Cannabidiol: Promise and Pitfalls
    Welty, Timothy E.
    Luebke, Adrienne
    Gidal, Barry E.
    EPILEPSY CURRENTS, 2014, 14 (05) : 250 - 252
  • [7] Biotypes: Promise and Pitfalls
    Barch, Deanna M.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 82 (01) : 2 - 3
  • [8] Coping: Pitfalls and promise
    Folkman, S
    Moskowitz, JT
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 : 745 - 774
  • [9] Promise and pitfalls of the Immunochip
    Cortes, Adrian
    Brown, Matthew A.
    ARTHRITIS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2011, 13 (01)
  • [10] The Promise and Pitfalls of the Real
    Snyder-Young, Dani
    THEATRE SURVEY, 2016, 57 (03) : 424 - 431