Improvement of embryo, cryopreservation and embryo transfer methods in small ruminants

被引:0
|
作者
Baril, G [1 ]
Cognie, Y [1 ]
Pougnard, JL [1 ]
Leboeuf, B [1 ]
Traldi, AS [1 ]
Guignot, F [1 ]
Beckers, JF [1 ]
Mermillod, P [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA, Unite Physiol Reprod & Comportements, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
In small ruminants, the costs of embryo transfer is a main limiting factor to the use of this method. The use of ultra rapid techniques such as embryo vitrification and direct transfer may contributed to reduce a part of the costs and increase the use of embryo transfer in sheep and goats. In order to evaluate the efficiency of these techniques, two experiments were performed. In a first experiment the viability of vitrified/thawed embryos was compared to results obtained after transfer of fresh embryos in ewes or frozen embryos (with slow freezing method) in goats. The pregnancy rate at term as well as embryo survival rate did not differ significantly according to embryo treatment (in ewes : 72% and 60% for fresh embryos vs 72% and 50% for vitrified embryos; in goats : 69% and 55% for frozen embryos vs 48% and 39% for vitrified embryos). In a second experiment, the possibility to transfer the vitrified embryos or frozen embryos directly after thawing (without cryo-protectant removal and evaluation of the morphological status of the embryos) was tested by comparison with the standard technique of transfer of vitrified or frozen/thawed embryos (removal of cryoprotectant and morphological evaluation). No significant effect of the transfer method was observed on the pregnancy rate at term and embryo survival rate (in ewes/vitrified embryos : 67% and 49% for traditional transfer vs 75% and 53% for direct transfer; in goats/ vitrified embryos : 23% and 15% for traditional transfer vs 38% and 26% for direct transfer; in goats/frozen embryos : 74% and 45% for traditional transfer vs 71% and 57% for direct transfer).
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 368
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EMBRYO COLLECTION AND TRANSFER IN SMALL RUMINANTS
    KRAEMER, DC
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 1989, 31 (01) : 141 - 148
  • [2] New approaches to superovulation and embryo transfer in small ruminants
    Menchaca, A.
    Vilarino, M.
    Crispo, M.
    de Castro, T.
    Rubianes, E.
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 22 (01) : 113 - 118
  • [3] In vitro embryo production in small ruminants
    de Figueiredo Freitas, Vicente Jose
    Melo, Luciana Magalhaes
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA-BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 39 : 409 - 413
  • [4] IN VIVO EMBRYO PRODUCTION IN SMALL RUMINANTS
    Carneiro, Gustavo Ferrer
    ACTA SCIENTIAE VETERINARIAE, 2008, 36 : S219 - S222
  • [5] Update on Donkey Embryo Transfer and Cryopreservation
    Panzani, Duccio
    Rota, Alessandra
    Tesi, Matteo
    Fanelli, Diana
    Camillo, Francesco
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2018, 65 : 50 - 54
  • [6] CHANGE IN EMBRYO SCORE POST CRYOPRESERVATION AND EMBRYO TRANSFER SUCCESS RATES
    Bergin, Keri
    Borenzweig, William
    Levin, Isabelle Kate
    Baird, Morgan
    Slifkin, Richard E.
    Lekovich, Jovana
    Mukherjee, Tanmoy
    Copperman, Alan B.
    Buyuk, Erkan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2023, 120 (04) : E4 - E5
  • [7] Human Embryo Cryopreservation-Methods, Timing, and other Considerations for Optimizing an Embryo Cryopreservation Program
    Sparks, Amy E. T.
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 33 (02) : 128 - 144
  • [8] Embryo transfer in small ruminants:: the method of choice for health control in germplasm exchanges
    Thibier, M
    Guérin, B
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2000, 62 (03): : 253 - 270
  • [9] EMBRYO CRYOPRESERVATION WITH WARMING INCREASES PREECLAMPSIA COMPARED TO FRESH EMBRYO TRANSFER.
    Barsky, M.
    Wilson, D.
    Bernson, D.
    Zhang, Y.
    Sites, C. K.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (03) : E320 - E320
  • [10] Contribution of embryo cryopreservation to elective single embryo transfer in IVF-ICSI
    Le Lannou, Dominique
    Griveau, Jean-Francois
    Laurent, Marie-Christine
    Gueho, Annie
    Veron, Elisabeth
    Morcel, Karine
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2006, 13 (03) : 368 - 375