Restrictive versus liberal strategy for red blood-cell transfusion in hip fracture patients A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:28
|
作者
Zhu, Chao [1 ]
Yin, Jian [1 ]
Wang, Bin [1 ]
Xue, Qingmei [1 ]
Gao, Shan [1 ]
Xing, Linyu [2 ]
Wang, Hua [1 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Xinhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Jiangning Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Jiangning Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
blood transfusion; hip fracture; liberal transfusion; restrictive transfusion; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; OLDER-ADULTS; RISK; THRESHOLDS; MORTALITY; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; SURGERY; STROKE;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000016795
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Most clinical guidelines recommend a restrictive red-blood-cell (RBC) transfusion threshold. However, indications for transfusion in patients with a hip fracture have not been definitively evaluated or remain controversial. We compared the pros and cons of restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) to investigate the effects of a restrictive strategy versus its liberal counterpart in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. The main clinical outcomes included delirium, mortality, infections, cardiogenic complications, thromboembolic events, cerebrovascular accidents, and length of hospital stay. The meta-analysis program of the Cochrane Collaboration (RevMan version 5.3.0) was used for data analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by both Cochran chi-squared test (Q test) and I-2 test. Both Begg and Egger tests were used to assess potential publication bias. Results: We identified 7 eligible RCTs and 2 eligible RCSs, involving 3,575 patients in total. In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, we found no differences in frequency of delirium, mortality, the incidence rates of all infections, pneumonia, wound infection, all cardiovascular events, congestive heart failure, thromboembolic events or length of hospital stay between restrictive and liberal thresholds for RBC transfusion (P >.05). However, we found that the use of restrictive transfusion thresholds is associated with higher rates of acute coronary syndrome (P <.05) while liberal transfusion thresholds increase the risk of cerebrovascular accidents (P <.05). Conclusion: In patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, clinicians should evaluate the patient s condition in detail and adopt different transfusion strategies according to the patient s specific situation rather than merely using a certain transfusion strategy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Restrictive Versus Liberal Strategy for Red Blood-Cell Transfusion A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Orthopaedic Patients
    Gu, Wan-Jie
    Gu, Xiao-Ping
    Wu, Xiang-Dong
    Chen, Hao
    Kwong, Joey S. W.
    Zhou, Lu-Yang
    Chen, Shuo
    Ma, Zheng-Liang
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (08): : 686 - 695
  • [2] Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategies for red blood cell transfusion after hip or knee surgery A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mao, Tianli
    Gao, Fuqiang
    Han, Jun
    Sun, Wei
    Guo, Wanshou
    Li, Zirong
    Wang, Weiguo
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (25)
  • [3] Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for red blood cell transfusion: systematic review of randomised trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Holst, Lars B.
    Petersen, Marie W.
    Haase, Nicolai
    Perner, Anders
    Wetterslev, Jorn
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [4] Liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Hirano, Yohei
    Miyoshi, Yukari
    Kondo, Yutaka
    Okamoto, Ken
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 23 (1)
  • [5] Liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Yohei Hirano
    Yukari Miyoshi
    Yutaka Kondo
    Ken Okamoto
    Hiroshi Tanaka
    Critical Care, 23
  • [6] Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy for red blood cell transfusion in critically ill patients and in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Ripolles Melchor, Javier
    Casans Frances, Ruben
    Espinosa, Angel
    Martinez Hurtado, Eugenio
    Navarro Perez, Rosalia
    Abad Gurumeta, Alfredo
    Basora, Misericordia
    Calvo Vecino, Jose M.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2016, 82 (05) : 582 - 598
  • [7] Effect of restrictive versus liberal red cell transfusion strategies on haemostasis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Desborough, Michael J. R.
    Colman, Katherine S.
    Prick, Babette W.
    Duvekot, Johannes J.
    Sweeney, Connor
    Odutayo, Ayodele
    Jairath, Vipul
    Doree, Carolyn
    Trivella, Marialena
    Hopewell, Sally
    Estcourt, Lise J.
    Stanworth, Simon J.
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2017, 117 (05) : 889 - 898
  • [8] Restrictive vs liberal blood transfusion strategy for patients with burn trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dirjayanto, Valerie J.
    Anjani, Jasmine V.
    Ariviani, Tazkiya P.
    Satria, Febriyan N.
    Abubakar, Raisa Z. M.
    Rhania, Cut A.
    Arsyaf, Muhammad A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2023, 84 (05)
  • [9] Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion for cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Babikir Kheiri
    Ahmed Abdalla
    Mohammed Osman
    Tarek Haykal
    Sai Chintalapati
    James Cranford
    Jason Sotzen
    Meghan Gwinn
    Sahar Ahmed
    Mustafa Hassan
    Ghassan Bachuwa
    Deepak L. Bhatt
    Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2019, 47 : 179 - 185
  • [10] Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion for cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Kheiri, Babikir
    Abdalla, Ahmed
    Osman, Mohammed
    Haykal, Tarek
    Chintalapati, Sai
    Cranford, James
    Sotzen, Jason
    Gwinn, Meghan
    Ahmed, Sahar
    Hassan, Mustafa
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2019, 47 (02) : 179 - 185