The non-consensus 1992 consensus

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Austin Horng-En [1 ]
Yeh, Yao-Yuan [2 ]
Wu, Charles K. S. [3 ]
Chen, Fang-Yu [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nevada, Dept Polit Sci, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
[2] Univ St Thomas, Dept Int Studies & Modern Languages, Houston, TX 77006 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Polit Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Michigan State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
1992; consensus; China politics; cross-strait relationship; political knowledge; Taiwan politics;
D O I
10.1111/aspp.12576
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The 1992 Consensus is perhaps the most crucial political term for cross-strait relations. Surveys show that the public consistently supports it in Taiwan. Despite the alleged broad support, there has not been an academic study examining if Taiwanese people understand the content of the 1992 Consensus. Such an inquiry is important as the administration in Taiwan has yet accepted the Consensus in its interactions with Beijing. A nearly representative online survey was conducted in July 2018, and 1001 Taiwanese respondents were recruited to choose among different "definitions" of the 1992 Consensus. Results show that only one-third of the respondents chose the version that Kuomintang agreed on, while another one-third misperceived the 1992 Consensus as a country-to-country agreement. Taiwanese people might have supported the Consensus for content that it is not. We then discuss the policy implications of our study for both China and Taiwan and provide future research orientations.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 227
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The consensus of non-consensus or the failure of a language policy in Puerto Rico
    Rivera, Melvin Gonzalez
    HISPANIA-A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE TEACHING OF SPANISH AND PORTUGUESE, 2020, 103 (02): : 211 - 224
  • [2] Non-consensus Opinion Models on Complex Networks
    Qian Li
    Lidia A. Braunstein
    Huijuan Wang
    Jia Shao
    H. Eugene Stanley
    Shlomo Havlin
    Journal of Statistical Physics, 2013, 151 : 92 - 112
  • [3] Non-consensus Opinion Models on Complex Networks
    Li, Qian
    Braunstein, Lidia A.
    Wang, Huijuan
    Shao, Jia
    Stanley, H. Eugene
    Havlin, Shlomo
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 151 (1-2) : 92 - 112
  • [4] On non-consensus motions of dynamical linear multiagent systems
    Cai, Ning
    Deng, Chun-Lin
    Wu, Qiu-Xuan
    PRAMANA-JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2018, 91 (02):
  • [5] On non-consensus motions of dynamical linear multiagent systems
    Ning Cai
    Chun-Lin Deng
    Qiu-Xuan Wu
    Pramana, 2018, 91
  • [6] The Non-consensus Entrepreneur: Organizational Responses to Vital Events
    Pontikes, Elizabeth G.
    Barnett, William P.
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2017, 62 (01) : 140 - 178
  • [7] Cost-effectiveness of non-consensus double reading
    Cairns, J
    van der Pol, M
    BREAST, 1998, 7 (05): : 243 - 246
  • [8] Mean-field dynamics of the non-consensus opinion model
    Liu, Xinhan
    Achterberg, M. A.
    Kooij, Robert
    APPLIED NETWORK SCIENCE, 2024, 9 (01)
  • [9] N-linked Glycosylation on Non-Consensus Protein Motifs
    Balland, Alain
    Valliere-Douglass, John
    Kodama, Paul
    Mujacic, Mirna
    Eakin, Catherine
    Brady, Lowell
    Wang, Wei-Chun
    Wallace, Alison
    Treuheit, Michael
    Reddy, Pranhitha
    GLYCOBIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (11) : 1469 - 1469
  • [10] Non-consensus states in circular opinion model with repulsive interaction
    Han, Wenchen
    Gao, Shun
    Huang, Changwei
    Yang, Junzhong
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2022, 585