The risk of unexploded ordnance on construction sites in London, UK

被引:2
|
作者
Owen, Marc [1 ]
McNamara, Andrew [2 ]
Panchal, Jignasha [3 ]
机构
[1] Skanska Bldg UK, London, England
[2] City Univ London, Sch Engn & Math Sci, London, England
[3] City Univ London, London, England
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOTECHNICS | 2021年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
geohazard mitigation; land contamination; piles & piling;
D O I
10.1680/jenge.18.00049
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Greater London, UK, among many large cities, was subject to bombing by the German military in both the First World War and Second World War (WW2) and was the target of many air raids during WW2. This was particularly the case during the Blitz, September 1940-May 1941, when over 28 000 high-explosive bombs and parachute mines were dropped on London. Post-war research conducted in 1949 estimated that approximately 12 750 t of bombs, including V1 and V2 rockets, were dropped on London. The night of 16-17 April 1941 was one of the worst bombing raids, when 446 t of bombs were dropped on London and over 58 t did not detonate. Unexploded bombs remain buried underground today, as they were unidentified at the time or abandoned owing to difficulties in recovering them. Uncharted bombs continue to pose a potentially significant hazard for developments around London. This paper considers the probability of discovering unexploded ordnance (UXO), particularly WW2 ordnance, during intrusive groundworks in London. The prevalence of UXO has been assessed using data obtained from governmental organisations to estimate the likelihood of discovery in London.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 123
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk assessment for unexploded ordnance remediation
    Laurens Beran
    Barry Zelt
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2015, 29 : 1051 - 1061
  • [2] Risk assessment for unexploded ordnance remediation
    Beran, Laurens
    Zelt, Barry
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2015, 29 (03) : 1051 - 1061
  • [3] Unexploded ordnance
    Ozanian, MK
    FORBES, 2004, 174 (06): : 130 - 131
  • [4] Assessing sites contaminated with unexploded ordnance: Statistical modeling of ordnance spatial distribution
    Macdonald, JA
    Small, MJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (03) : 931 - 938
  • [5] Unexploded ordnance risk assessment on Crossrail project in London - pre-empting best practice
    Smith, Phil
    Lawrence, Ursula
    Terry, Sarah
    Cooke, Simon
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 166 (04) : 333 - 342
  • [6] Removal of unexploded ordnance
    Oh, John S.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 62 (06): : S21 - S21
  • [7] Unexploded Ordnance Management
    Oh, John S.
    Seery, Jason M.
    Grabo, Daniel J.
    Ervin, Mark D.
    Wertin, Tom M.
    Hawks, Ryan P.
    Benov, Avi
    Stockinger, Zsolt T.
    MILITARY MEDICINE, 2018, 183 : 24 - 28
  • [8] Reducing Risk on Unexploded Ordnance by Vibrations in the Rotterdam Subsoil
    Zandbergen, Don
    Martens, Joost
    GEOTECHNICAL SAFETY AND RISK V, 2015, : 191 - 196
  • [9] Cleaning up unexploded ordnance
    MacDonald, JA
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (17) : 372A - 376A
  • [10] Accounting for geophysical information in geostatistical characterization of unexploded ordnance (UXO) sites
    Saito, H
    McKenna, SA
    Goovaerts, P
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2005, 12 (01) : 7 - 25