Use of 3.0-T MR Imaging for Evaluation of the Abdomen

被引:42
|
作者
Erturk, Sukru Mehmet [2 ]
Alberich-Bayarri, Angel [3 ]
Herrmann, Karin A. [4 ]
Marti-Bonmati, Luis [3 ]
Ros, Pablo R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Sisli Etfal Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Hosp Quiron Valencia, Dept Radiol, Valencia, Spain
[4] Univ Munich, Univ Hosp, Inst Clin Radiol, Munich, Germany
关键词
1.5; T; RENAL-ARTERIES; LIVER; COIL; COLONOGRAPHY; SPECTROSCOPY; ANGIOGRAPHY; HOMOGENEITY; FREQUENCY; SEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1148/rg.296095516
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The most important advantage of 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging systems is their increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared with 1.5-T systems. The higher SNR can be used to shorten acquisition time, achieve higher spatial resolution, or a combination of the two, thereby improving image quality and clinical diagnosis. In fact, 3.0-T MR imaging systems have already proved superior to 1.5-T systems in neuroradiologic and musculoskeletal applications. In the abdomen, 3.0-T MR imaging is uniquely beneficial for techniques such as enhanced and nonenhanced hepatic imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, angiography, MR pancreatography, and colonography. Admittedly, 3.0-T abdominal imaging has important technical limitations, such as standing wave artifact, chemical shift artifact, susceptibility artifact, and safety issues such as increased energy deposition within the patient's body. Furthermore, 3.0-T abdominal MR imaging is still in the early stages of development and requires substantial modifications of the pulse sequences and hardware components used for 1.5-T imaging. Nevertheless, the ability to obtain physiologic and functional information within reasonably short acquisition times with 3.0-T abdominal MR imaging bodes well for the future of this imaging technique. (C) RSNA, 2009 . radiographics.rsna.org
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1564
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3.0-T MR Imaging of the Abdomen: Comparison with 1.5 T
    Chang, Kevin J.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Bluemke, David A.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (07) : 1983 - 1998
  • [2] 3.0-T MR Imaging of Wrist Ligament
    Magee, T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (05)
  • [3] Breast Cancer: Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with 3.0-T MR Imaging
    Chen, Jeon-Hor
    Bahri, Shadfar
    Mehta, Rita S.
    Kuzucan, Aida
    Yu, Hon J.
    Carpenter, Philip M.
    Feig, Stephen A.
    Lin, Muqing
    Hsiang, David J. B.
    Lane, Karen T.
    Butler, John A.
    Nalcioglu, Orhan
    Su, Min-Ying
    RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (03) : 735 - 743
  • [4] Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0-T MR imaging compared with 1.5-t MR arthrography: Preliminary experience
    Sundberg, TP
    Toomayan, GA
    Major, NM
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (02) : 706 - 711
  • [5] Evaluation of Treatment Response of Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging on 3.0-T MR Imaging
    Sahin, Hilal
    Harman, Mustafa
    Cinar, Celal
    Bozkaya, Halil
    Parildar, Mustafa
    Elmas, Nevra
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (02) : 241 - 247
  • [6] Role of 3.0-T MR Colonography in the Evaluation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Rimola, Jordi
    Rodriguez, Sonia
    Garcia-Bosch, Orlando
    Ricart, Elena
    Pages, Mario
    Pellise, Maria
    Ayuso, Carmen
    Panes, Julian
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2009, 29 (03) : 701 - 719
  • [7] Uterine Cervical Carcinoma: Preoperative Staging with 3.0-T MR Imaging-Comparison with 1.5-T MR Imaging
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Imaoka, Izumi
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Tomoda, Kaname
    Tsutsui, Tateki
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Kimura, Tadashi
    Nakamura, Hironobu
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (01) : 96 - 104
  • [8] Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: Evaluation of precision and accuracy
    Bauer, Jan S.
    Krause, Stefanie J.
    Ross, Christian J.
    Krug, Roland
    Carballido-Gamio, Julio
    Ozhinsky, Eugene
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    Link, Thomas M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) : 399 - 406
  • [9] Lymphatic pathway around the pancreatic head and extrahepatic bile duct: evaluation using MR imaging at 3.0-T
    Yasunari Yamada
    Hiromu Mori
    Shunro Matsumoto
    Maki Kiyonaga
    Michiaki Sai
    Ryo Takaji
    Kenichiro Tomonari
    Rika Tanoue
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 1617 - 1628
  • [10] Lymphatic pathway around the pancreatic head and extrahepatic bile duct: evaluation using MR imaging at 3.0-T
    Yamada, Yasunari
    Mori, Hiromu
    Matsumoto, Shunro
    Kiyonaga, Maki
    Sai, Michiaki
    Takaji, Ryo
    Tomonari, Kenichiro
    Tanoue, Rika
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (06): : 1617 - 1628