A poor response in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is not necessarily related to a poor prognosis in subsequent cycles

被引:102
|
作者
Klinkert, ER
Broekmans, FJM
Looman, CWN
Velde, ERT
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Ctr Med, Div Perinatol & Gynecol, Dept Reprod Med, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Fac Med, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
IVF; poor response; cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To calculate the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate in patients with a poor response in their first IVF cycle. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: In vitro fertilization unit of a university hospital. Patient(s): Two hundred twenty-five women who experienced a poor response in their first IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. These patients were divided into 64 expected (aged 41 years and/or elevated FSH level) and 161 unexpected poor responders (aged <41 years and FSH level not elevated). Intervention(s): In vitro fertilization treatment with a long-suppression protocol with FSH-urofollitropin or recombinant FSH. Main Outcome Measure(s): Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate. This rate was calculated in two ways to correct for dropouts: pessimistic (zero chance of pregnancy for the dropouts) and optimistic (the same chance for the dropouts as for patients who continued). Result(s): The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate of women with an unexpected poor response in the first cycle was 37% (pessimistic) to 47% (optimistic) after three cycles. Women with an expected poor response had a cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate of 16% (pessimistic) to 19% (optimistic) after 3 cycles. Sixty-four percent of the unexpected poor responders and 31% of the expected poor responders had a normal response in the second cycle, most of them after receiving a higher dose of gonadotropins. Conclusion(s): Most patients with an unexpected poor response in the first cycle had a normal response in the second cycle, leading to an acceptable cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate after three cycles. Patients with an expected poor response in the first cycle should be advised to withdraw from treatment after the first cycle because of a poor prognosis. (Fertil Steril((R)) 2004;81:1247-53. (C)2004 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.).
引用
收藏
页码:1247 / 1253
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Poor ovarian response in IVF cycle: incidence in the first cycle and prognosis in subsequent cycles according to age
    Arrivi, C.
    Ferraretti, A. P.
    Magli, M. C.
    Tartaglia, M. L.
    Fasolino, M. C.
    Gianaroli, L.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I302 - I303
  • [2] Ovarian Sensitivity Index in the First in Vitro Fertilization Cycle Is as Good as the Bologna Criteria for Predicting Poor Ovarian Response in a Subsequent Treatment Cycle
    Ko, Jennifer Ka Yee
    Lee, Vivian Chi Yan
    Li, Raymond Hang Wun
    Ho, Pak Chung
    Ng, Ernest Hung Yu
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 64 (3-4) : 137 - 141
  • [3] Natural cycle in vitro fertilization cycle in poor responders
    Reyftmann, L.
    Dechaud, H.
    Loup, V.
    Anahory, T.
    Brunet-Joyeux, C.
    Lacroix, N.
    Harriamah, S.
    Hedon, B.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2007, 35 (04): : 352 - 358
  • [4] In vitro fertilization following natural cycles in poor responders
    Feldman, B
    Seidman, DS
    Levron, J
    Bider, D
    Shulman, A
    Shine, S
    Dor, J
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2001, 15 (05) : 328 - 334
  • [5] Predictive value of the results of a first in-vitro fertilization cycle on the outcome of subsequent cycles
    Croucher, CA
    Lass, A
    Margara, R
    Winston, RM
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (02) : 403 - 408
  • [6] Does assisted hatching affect live birth in fresh, first cycle in vitro fertilization in good and poor prognosis patients?
    McLaughlin, Jessica E.
    Choi, Byeong Y.
    Liu, Qianqian
    Gelfond, Jonathan A.
    Robinson, Randal D.
    Chang, T. Arthur
    Knudtson, Jennifer F.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2019, 36 (12) : 2425 - 2433
  • [7] Does assisted hatching affect live birth in fresh, first cycle in vitro fertilization in good and poor prognosis patients?
    Jessica E. McLaughlin
    Byeong Y. Choi
    Qianqian Liu
    Jonathan A. Gelfond
    Randal D. Robinson
    T. Arthur Chang
    Jennifer F. Knudtson
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2019, 36 : 2425 - 2433
  • [8] Poor Ovarian Response to Stimulation for In Vitro Fertilization
    Spremovic-Radjenovic, Svetlana
    Bila, Jovan
    Gudovic, Aleksandra
    Vidakovic, Snezana
    Dokic, Milan
    Radunovic, Nebojsa
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2015, 143 (5-6) : 354 - 361
  • [9] Natural-cycle in vitro fertilization in poor responder patients: a survey of 500 consecutive cycles
    Schimberni, Mauro
    Morgia, Francesco
    Colabianchi, Julio
    Giallonardo, Annalise
    Piscitelli, Claudio
    Giannini, Pierluigi
    Montigiani, Monica
    Sbracia, Marco
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (04) : 1297 - 1301
  • [10] Poor response after hormonal stimulation for in vitro fertilization is not related to ovarian aging
    De Sutter, P
    Dhont, M
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (06) : 1294 - 1298