KAPS (kinematic assessment of passive stretch): a tool to assess elbow flexor and extensor spasticity after stroke using a robotic exoskeleton

被引:17
|
作者
Centen, Andrew [1 ,4 ]
Lowrey, Catherine R. [5 ]
Scott, Stephen H. [5 ]
Yeh, Ting-Ting [4 ,6 ]
Mochizuki, George [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Heart & Stroke Fdn Canadian Partnership Stroke Re, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Res Inst, Brain Sci Res Program, 2075 Bayview Ave,M6-178, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Phys Therapy, Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Queens Univ, Ctr Neurosci Studies, Kingston, ON, Canada
[6] Natl Taiwan Univ, Sch Occupat Therapy, Coll Med, Taipei, Taiwan
基金
加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
Stroke; Spasticity; Robotics; Upper extremity; MODIFIED ASHWORTH SCALE; MODIFIED TARDIEU SCALE; UPPER-LIMB; REFLEX THRESHOLD; ADULT PATIENTS; MOTOR CONTROL; RELIABILITY; CONTRACTURE; POSTSTROKE; HYPERTONIA;
D O I
10.1186/s12984-017-0272-8
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Spasticity is a common sequela of stroke. Traditional assessment methods include relatively coarse scales that may not capture all characteristics of elevated muscle tone. Thus, the aim of this study was to develop a tool to quantitatively assess post-stroke spasticity in the upper extremity. Methods: Ninety-six healthy individuals and 46 individuals with stroke participated in this study. The kinematic assessment of passive stretch (KAPS) protocol consisted of passive elbow stretch in flexion and extension across an 80 degrees range in 5 movement durations. Sevenparameters were identified and assessed to characterize spasticity (peak velocity, final angle, creep (or release), between-arm peak velocity difference, between-arm final angle, between-arm creep, and between-arm catch angle). Results: The fastest movement duration (600 ms) was most effective at identifying impairment in each parameter associated with spasticity. A decrease in peak velocity during passive stretch between the affected and unaffected limb was most effective at identifying individuals as impaired. Spasticity was also associated with a decreased passive range (final angle) and a classic 'catch and release' as seen through between-arm catch and creep metrics. Conclusions: The KAPS protocol and robotic technology can provide a sensitive and quantitative assessment of post-stroke elbow spasticity not currently attainable through traditional measures.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] KAPS (kinematic assessment of passive stretch): a tool to assess elbow flexor and extensor spasticity after stroke using a robotic exoskeleton
    Andrew Centen
    Catherine R. Lowrey
    Stephen H. Scott
    Ting-Ting Yeh
    George Mochizuki
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 14
  • [2] Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton
    George Mochizuki
    Andrew Centen
    Myles Resnick
    Catherine Lowrey
    Sean P. Dukelow
    Stephen H. Scott
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 16
  • [3] Movement kinematics and proprioception in post-stroke spasticity: assessment using the Kinarm robotic exoskeleton
    Mochizuki, George
    Centen, Andrew
    Resnick, Myles
    Lowrey, Catherine
    Dukelow, Sean P.
    Scott, Stephen H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 16 (01)