Searching for the Good Plan A Meta-Analysis of Plan Quality Studies

被引:275
作者
Berke, Philip [1 ]
Godschalk, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
land use plan evaluation concepts; plan evaluation methodology; plan quality principles and criteria; meta-analysis of plan quality research; future directions in plan evaluation;
D O I
10.1177/0885412208327014
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Despite the centrality of comprehensive plans to the profession of city and regional planning, there is a gap in knowledge about the quality of plans as they are not routinely evaluated against best practice standards. We discuss plan quality evaluation, an emerging methodology for assessing the quality of plans. We review the evolution of the concept, the dimensions covered, and the principles and criteria used. We then provide a comparative meta-analytic analysis of the findings from published plan quality evaluations, ranging from research studies in the United States to national planning policy applications in Holland and New Zealand, and offer recommendations about future directions in improving content analysis of plan documents and research design in plan quality evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 240
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[2]  
Ballon H., 2007, R MOSES MODERN CITY
[3]   Land use-transportation scenario planning: promise and reality [J].
Bartholomew, Keith .
TRANSPORTATION, 2007, 34 (04) :397-412
[4]  
Beatley T., 1999, GREEN URBANISM LEARN
[5]  
Beatley T., 2005, NATIVE NOWHERE SUSTA
[6]  
Berke P R., 1996, J. Environ. Plan. Manage, V39, P79, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09640569612688, 10.1080/09640569612688]
[7]   What makes plan implementation successful? An evaluation of local plans and implementation practices in New Zealand [J].
Berke, Philip ;
Backhurst, Michael ;
Day, Maxine ;
Ericksen, Neil ;
Laurian, Lucie ;
Crawford, Jan ;
Dixon, Jennifer .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2006, 33 (04) :581-600
[8]  
Berke PhilipR., 2006, URBAN LAND USE PLANN, V5th
[9]   Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans [J].
Berke, PR ;
Conroy, MM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2000, 66 (01) :21-33
[10]   Coercive and cooperative intergovernmental mandates: A comparative analysis of Florida and New Zealand environmental plans [J].
Berke, PR ;
Dixon, J ;
Ericksen, N .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 1997, 24 (03) :451-468