Comparison of the design criteria of 141 onsite wastewater treatment systems available on the French market

被引:10
|
作者
Dubois, V. [1 ]
Boutin, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRSTEA, Ecol & Pollut Unit, Freshwater Syst, 5 rue Doua,BP 32108, F-32108 Villeurbanne, France
关键词
Attached growth on fine media; On-site system; Suspended growth; Wastewater treatment systems; SMALL COMMUNITIES; PLANTS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
New EC standards published in 2009 led to a surge in onsite wastewater treatment systems reaching the European market. Here we summarize their technical aspects and compare them to known values used in centralized wastewater treatment. The paper deals with two types of processes: attached-growth systems (AGS) on fine media and suspended-growth systems (SGS). Covering 141 technical approvals and 36 manufacturers, we compare onsite design criteria against the centralized wastewater design criteria for each process. The systems use a wide range of materials for bacterial growth, from soil, sand or gravel to zeolite, coconut shavings or rockwool cubes, with a huge range of variation in useful surface, from 0.26 m(2)/PE for one rockwool cube filter to 5 m2/PE for a (traditional system) vertical sand filter. Some rockwool can handle applied daily surface load of 160 g BOD5/m(2). SGS design parameters range from 0.025 to 0.34 kg BOD5 per kg MLVSS/d with hydraulic retention times of 0.28-3.7 d. For clarifier design, water velocity ranges from 0.15 to 1.47 m/h. In the sludge line, sludge storage volume ranges from 0.125 down to just 0.56 m(3)/PE. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 304
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Guidance available for onsite wastewater treatment systems
    Spicer, Steve
    Water Environment and Technology, 2002, 14 (08): : 29 - 30
  • [3] Onsite Wastewater Treatment Management Systems
    Allison, Leigh
    Kaminsky, Jessica
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2016: OLD AND NEW CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGIES CONVERGE IN HISTORIC SAN JUAN, 2016, : 1577 - 1587
  • [4] Design Hydraulic Loading Rates for Onsite Wastewater Systems
    Radcliffe, D. E.
    West, L. T.
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2009, 8 (01): : 64 - 74
  • [5] Removal of Pathogens in Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems: A Review of Design Considerations and Influencing Factors
    Wang, Mian
    Zhu, Julia
    Mao, Xinwei
    WATER, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [6] Integrated Risk Framework for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems
    Steven Carroll
    Ashantha Goonetilleke
    Evan Thomas
    Megan Hargreaves
    Ray Frost
    Les Dawes
    Environmental Management, 2006, 38 : 286 - 303
  • [7] Integrated risk framework for onsite wastewater treatment systems
    Carroll, Steven
    Goonetilleke, Ashantha
    Thomas, Evan
    Hargreaves, Megan
    Frost, Ray
    Dawes, Les
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2006, 38 (02) : 286 - 303
  • [8] Evaluation of onsite wastewater treatment technologies using sustainable development criteria
    Barbara R. Bradley
    Glen T. Daigger
    Robert Rubin
    George Tchobanoglous
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2002, 4 (2) : 87 - 99
  • [9] Review of Organic Wastewater Compound Concentrations and Removal in Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems
    Schaider, Laurel A.
    Rodgers, Kathryn M.
    Rudel, Ruthann A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (13) : 7304 - 7317
  • [10] Natural denitrification in groundwater impacted by onsite wastewater treatment systems
    Anderson, DL
    ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL COMMUNITY SEWAGE SYSTEMS, 1998, : 336 - 345