Systematic Literature Review with Support of Digital Tools
被引:0
|
作者:
Fornari, Lucimara Fabiana
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Collect Hlth Nursing, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Dept Collect Hlth Nursing, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Fornari, Lucimara Fabiana
[1
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Pinho, Isabel
[2
]
de Almeida, Carla Azevedo
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Aveiro, Educ & Psychol Dept, Aveiro, Portugal
Univ Porto, Law Fac, Aveiro, PortugalUniv Sao Paulo, Dept Collect Hlth Nursing, Sao Paulo, Brazil
de Almeida, Carla Azevedo
[3
,4
]
Costa, Antonio Pedro
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Aveiro, Educ & Psychol Dept, Aveiro, PortugalUniv Sao Paulo, Dept Collect Hlth Nursing, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Costa, Antonio Pedro
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Collect Hlth Nursing, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Aveiro, Governance Competitiveness & Publ Policies, Aveiro, Portugal
[3] Univ Aveiro, Educ & Psychol Dept, Aveiro, Portugal
systematic literature review;
digital tools;
qualitative research;
content analysis;
CAQDAS;
EXPERIENCES;
ONCOLOGY;
D O I:
10.1109/iscaie.2019.8743787
中图分类号:
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号:
0812 ;
摘要:
This study aims to identify and compare the digital tools used in Systematic Literature Review, type of review commonly used in Qualitative Research. For that, a Systematic Literature Review was carried out with the support of webQDA: Qualitative Data Analysis software. A search in the databases resulted in 745 articles. However, from the inclusion and eligibility criteria of the studies, 22 articles were selected for this research. The results are the 6 of specific digital tools and 3 of qualitative data analysis tools used in the development of Systematic Literature Review. Besides, the study also aimed to understand in which of the 9 steps, that constitute the systematic literature review, if these tools could be used.