Modeling Low-Frequency Anthropogenic Noise in the Oceans: A Comparison of Propagation Models

被引:4
|
作者
Hovem, Jens M. [1 ]
Korakas, Alexios [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Elect & Telecommun Acoust, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
air gun noises; fish reaction; parabolic equation; propogation modeling; ray theory; PARABOLIC EQUATION; CATCH RATES; SOUNDS;
D O I
10.4031/MTSJ.48.2.8
中图分类号
P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Increased human activities in the marine environment in recent years have caused a significant general increase in ocean noise level, raising concerns over its impact on marine life. Anthropogenic noise in the oceans covers a wide range of frequencies down to 10 Hz and can propagate over distances up to several tens of kilometers. Many environmental factors affect the propagation conditions and make it impossible to express the propagation with a simple equation. Mathematical/numerical modeling is required to predict and evaluate the impact of man-made noise on marine life. The study compares transmission loss versus range calculated by a wavenumber integration model, a model based on the parabolic equation (PE), and a ray-tracing model. The models are tested and compared for a number of different scenarios with fluid and elastic bottom layers in range-dependent environments. Each case is analyzed and interpreted at several frequencies from 15 to 250 Hz. The simulation results showed excellent agreement between the PE and the ray result for the transmission loss over a range of 10 km in a relative steep upslope elastic bottom environment and for frequencies down to about 25 Hz. In another test, comparisons over a 50-km upslope continental shelf scenario resulted in good agreement for the fluid bottom for frequencies above 100 Hz and poorer for 50 Hz. Over the elastic high loss boom, the two results showed the same general trend but with differences in details. Overall, the ray-tracing model appears to be an acceptable and efficient choice providing reliable predictions, even at low frequencies, in shallow water
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 80
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of modeling approaches to low-frequency noise propagation in the ocean
    Korakas, Alexios
    Hovem, Jens Martin
    2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS - BERGEN, 2013,
  • [2] DOWN-SLOPE ENHANCEMENT MODELS FOR LOW-FREQUENCY OCEAN NOISE AND PROPAGATION
    NORTHROP, J
    WAGSTAFF, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1978, 64 : S46 - S46
  • [3] A comparison of low-frequency radio noise amplitude probability distribution models
    Chrissan, DA
    Fraser-Smith, AC
    RADIO SCIENCE, 2000, 35 (01) : 195 - 208
  • [4] Comparison of models for sound propagation of low frequency wind turbine noise
    Jung, SungSoo
    Park, Taeho
    Lee, ByungKwon
    Kim, JinHyeong
    Choi, TaeMuk
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF KOREA, 2024, 43 (02): : 162 - 167
  • [5] Statistical Modeling of Low-Frequency Noise in MOSFETs
    Wirth, Gilson
    da Silva, Roberto
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND FLUCTUATIONS (ICNF), 2015,
  • [6] Effect of anthropogenic low-frequency noise on the foraging ecology of Balaenoptera whales
    Croll, DA
    Clark, CW
    Calambokidis, J
    Ellison, WT
    Tershy, BR
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2001, 4 : 13 - 27
  • [7] SOME LOW-FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN PROPAGATION LOSS MODELS
    BARTBERGER, CL
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1978, 64 : S44 - S44
  • [8] Modeling of the low-frequency noise in thermal lens spectrometry
    Martín-Biosca, Y
    Rozé, C
    Ramis-Ramos, G
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 1998, 38 (03) : 169 - 174
  • [9] Modeling of low-frequency noise in advanced CMOS devices
    Balestra, F.
    Ghibaudo, G.
    Jomaah, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING-ELECTRONIC NETWORKS DEVICES AND FIELDS, 2015, 28 (06) : 613 - 627
  • [10] Characterization and Modeling of Graphene Transistor Low-Frequency Noise
    Grandchamp, B.
    Fregonese, S.
    Majek, C.
    Hainaut, C.
    Maneux, C.
    Meng, N.
    Happy, H.
    Zimmer, T.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES, 2012, 59 (02) : 516 - 519