Centralizing cohesion policy in times of austerity: evidence from the policy cycle

被引:7
|
作者
Casula, Mattia [1 ]
机构
[1] Ca Foscari Univ, Dept Philosophy & Cultural Heritage, Malcanton Marcora Dorsoduro 3484-A, I-30123 Venice, Italy
关键词
European structural and investment funds; cohesion policy governance; Europe; 2020; EU governance; policy analysis;
D O I
10.1080/01442872.2019.1606903
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
European policy-making has been interpreted as a pendulum that swings between the Member States (MSs) and the transnational arena when choices about where to assign policy responsibilities have to be made. As in other policy sectors, the pendulum metaphor has been used to interpret the changes which have occurred in Cohesion Policy supremacy. This article analyses how the attribution of responsibilities between the European Commission (EC), and the MSs has changed in the different phases of the policy cycle since the 1988 reform to the present day, simultaneously with the main stages of the European integration process. The main argument is that the 2008 Global Financial Crisis was a critical juncture within the history of the aforementioned integration process because it opened the way for the pursuit of new paths: it favoured the consolidation of a new governance system that pivots on the EC's active role, by identifying Cohesion Policy as the main instrument to pursue the Europe 2020 objectives. Accordingly, this article provides interpretative keys with which to explain the changes that have occurred in intergovernmental relations since the 1988 reform, as well as analytical tools with which to understand the ongoing debate on the future of EU policy-making.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 414
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Families, policy and place in times of austerity
    Jupp, Eleanor
    AREA, 2017, 49 (03) : 266 - 272
  • [2] Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy
    Domorenok, Ekaterina
    Graziano, Paolo
    Polverari, Laura
    POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 40 (01) : 58 - 78
  • [3] Policy discourse in times of crisis Debating educational policy in Portugal in the years of austerity
    Alvares, Maria
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND POLITICS, 2022, 21 (05) : 742 - 762
  • [4] Turning evidence into policy: case study of austerity
    Stuckler, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 22 : 4 - 4
  • [5] Citizens' perception of Cohesion Policy: from theory to empirical evidence
    Capello, Roberta
    Perucca, Giovanni
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2019, 53 (11) : 1520 - 1530
  • [6] The role of social capital within policy networks: evidence from EU cohesion policy in Spain
    Jordana, Jacint
    Mota, Fabiola
    Noferini, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 78 (04) : 642 - 664
  • [7] Policy Analysis in Times of Austerity: Puzzling in the Shadow of Powering? Introduction
    Van Nispen, Frans K. M.
    Scholten, Peter W. A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS, 2016, 18 (05): : 439 - 447
  • [8] Varieties of crisis, varieties of austerity: social policy in challenging times
    Farnsworth, Kevin
    Irving, Zoe
    JOURNAL OF POVERTY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2012, 20 (02): : 133 - 147
  • [9] Gaining in impacts by leveraging the policy mix: Evidence from the European Cohesion Policy in more developed regions
    Cristofoletti, Enrico
    Gabriele, Roberto
    Giua, Mara
    JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 64 (01) : 60 - 79
  • [10] Cohesion policy and household income inequality: evidence from the Greek regions
    Psycharis, Yannis
    Tselios, Vassilis
    Pantazis, Panagiotis
    ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2024, 73 (04): : 1563 - 1591