Market(ing) Wisdom Differences between Family and Non-Family Firms: An Empirical Study on Small and Medium Enterprises

被引:1
|
作者
Ghouri, Arsalan Mujahid [1 ]
Khan, Naveed R. [2 ]
Khan, Mustafa R. [1 ]
Venkatesh, V. G. [3 ]
Srivastava, Hari [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia
[2] Bahria Univ, Karachi, Pakistan
[3] EM Normandie Busiess Sch, METIS Lab, Le Havre, France
[4] Auckland Univ Technol, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
SMEs; market orientation; marketing capabilities; marketing practices; family firms; ownership type; service sector; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; MARKETING CAPABILITIES; ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION; DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES; FARM DIVERSIFICATION; EMERGING MARKETS; BUSINESS; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; SMES;
D O I
10.1142/S0218495820500089
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In today's competitive business environment, family and non-family small and medium enterprises (SMEs) strive to survive despite many challenges. Market knowledge and marketing efforts are crucial for them to sustain and enhance business with limited resources. In this paper, we examined three constructs (i) market orientation, (ii) marketing capabilities and (iii) marketing practices impact on the SMEs' service sector performance. The interaction effect of ownership type (family and non-family firms) was also observed in the model. Data was collected from 240 SMEs in three major metropolitan cities. This study found positive relationships of each construct (market orientation, (ii) marketing capabilities and (iii) marketing practices) on firm performance as hypothesised. The interaction effect of ownership type i.e. family and non-family, evident on marketing capabilities and SMEs' performance. Non-family businesses are open for adopting new ideas and personnel into decision making. Family firms should be more adaptable to compete with non-family firms. The managerial and theoretical implications discussed in family and non-family firms' perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 200
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Theoretical and empirical differences between the interlocked boards of family and non-family firms
    Caiazza, Rosa
    Phan, Phillip H.
    Simoni, Michele
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS STRATEGY, 2023, 14 (02)
  • [2] Real managerial differences between family and non-family firms
    Smith, Max
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOUR & RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (05) : 278 - +
  • [3] Small family business performance: comparison between family and non-family enterprises
    Kirmanen, Antti
    Kansikas, Juha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURING, 2010, 2 (3-4) : 291 - 307
  • [4] Thriving in private family firms as a non-family employee: an empirical study
    Al Riyami, Said
    Razzak, Mohammad Rezaur
    Al Balushi, Maha Khamis
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 43 (03) : 321 - 335
  • [5] Research on knowledge sharing and interpersonal relationships: empirical study of family firms and non-family firms
    Lin, Wen-Bao
    QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2013, 47 (01) : 151 - 166
  • [6] Research on knowledge sharing and interpersonal relationships: empirical study of family firms and non-family firms
    Wen-Bao Lin
    Quality & Quantity, 2013, 47 : 151 - 166
  • [7] The Value of Internationalization for Emerging Market Firms - Family versus Non-Family firms
    Hsu, Chih-Hsiang
    Kao, Ming-Sung
    Lee, Lee-Men
    ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2016, 36 (02): : 1214 - +
  • [8] The success factors of family and non-family firms: Similarities and differences
    Zajkowski, Robert
    Safin, Krzysztof
    Stanczyk, Elzbieta
    ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2022, 10 (03) : 51 - 72
  • [9] Financial management differences between family and non-family Mexican tourist firms.
    Esparza, A. Jose L.
    Garcia-Perez de Lema, Domingo
    Durendez Gomez-Guillamon, Antonio
    ACTUALIDAD CONTABLE FACES, 2010, 13 (20): : 29 - 48
  • [10] WORK MOTIVATION OF FAMILY AND NON-FAMILY EMPLOYEES AT SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED ENTERPRISES (SMEs)
    Crnila, Igor
    Krecar, Irena Miljkovic
    Gregov, Zrinka
    EKONOMSKA MISAO I PRAKSA-ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND PRACTICE, 2015, 24 (02): : 533 - 554