Orthopaedic and trauma surgery in France: Do patterns differ across healthcare institution types (public community, public university, private not-for-profit, and private for-profit)?

被引:2
|
作者
Erivan, Roger [1 ,5 ]
Rigolot, Benoit [2 ]
Villatte, Guillaume [1 ]
Dartus, Julien [3 ,4 ]
Descamps, Stephane [1 ]
Boisgard, Stephane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont Ferrand, CNRS, SIGMA Clermont,ICCF, F-63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
[2] Univ Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
[3] Univ Lille Nord France, F-59000 Lille, France
[4] Ctr Hosp & Univ Lille, Hop Roger Salengro, Serv orthopedie, Pl Verdun, F-59037 Lille, France
[5] Hop Gabriel Montpied, Dept Chirurg Orthoped & Traumatol, CHU Clermont Ferrand, BP 69, F-63003 Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
Epidemiology; Nationwide data; Private; Public; Orthopedic surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103402
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: No studies have evaluated, to our knowledge, potential differences in practices in France according to type of healthcare institution, i.e., university public hospital, community public hospital, or private hospital with or without participation in the public healthcare system. The objectives of this study of the exhaustive information collected in the French hospital-admission database were to: (1) describe the numbers of the main procedures performed in France by orthopaedic and trauma surgeons in each type of institution and each subspecialty; and (2) to determine whether the pattern of procedures differed according to the type of healthcare institution. Hypothesis: Differences in surgical practice patterns exist across healthcare institution types and according to the nature of the procedures. Patients and methods: A retrospective observational nationwide study was performed using the exhaustive French hospital database. All surgical procedures done in 2019 for orthopaedic and trauma indications were collected. We then classified the procedures according to the most common diagnoses by distinguishing procedures on the hip, knee, shoulder, hand, spine, ankle, and foot, as well as paediatric and traumatology procedures. Results: Procedures performed more often in private institutions included those on the hip (93,225 [64.3%] of 144,919), knee (223,542 [75.5%] of 296,255), shoulder (103,923 [76.6%] of 300,577), hand (408,035 [77.6%] of 525,534), spine (for degenerative disease, 27,001 [71.2%] of 37,915), and ankle and foot (75,392 [77.1%] of 105,720). In contrast, of the 19,157 (80.3%) of the 23,848 paediatric procedures and 203,090 (67.7%) of the 300,065 traumatology procedures were done in public institutions. For all eight comparisons, the difference between public and private institutions was statistically significant. The overall trend was towards public university hospitals performing more paediatric and trauma procedures and more complex surgeries such as those required by multiple traumatic injuries. Discussion: Our study provides accurate numbers of surgical procedures done in public and private healthcare institutions in France in 2019. We found major differences not only across categories and specialties but also within specialties depending on the type of procedure. Orthopaedic surgical activity shows a marked imbalance in France between public and private institutions. Further research would be needed to identify the causes. Level of evidence: IV, retrospective observational epidemiological study. (c) 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Does Ownership Matter? An Overview of Systematic Reviews of the Performance of Private For-Profit, Private Not-For-Profit and Public Healthcare Providers
    Herrera, Cristian A.
    Rada, Gabriel
    Kuhn-Barrientos, Lucy
    Barrios, Ximena
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [2] Mortality outcomes in hospitals with public, private not-for-profit and private for-profit ownership in Chile 2001-2010
    Cid Pedraza, Camilo
    Herrera, Cristian A.
    Prieto Toledo, Lorena
    Oyarzun, Felipe
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2015, 30 : i75 - i81
  • [3] Shifting sands: assessing the balance between public, private not-for-profit and private for-profit physical therapy delivery in Ontario, Canada
    Landry, Michel D.
    Williams, A. Paul
    Verrier, Molly C.
    Holyoke, Paul
    Zakus, David
    Deber, Raisa B.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 13 (03) : 189 - 199
  • [4] Public stewardship of private for-profit healthcare providers in low- and middle-income countries
    Wiysonge, Charles S.
    Abdullahi, Leila H.
    Ndze, Valantine N.
    Hussey, Gregory D.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (08):
  • [5] Public-private Partnership: How and Why Six Community Colleges Loved and Left a For-profit Partner
    Farakish, Negar
    Jaggars, Shanna
    Fay, Maggie
    INNOVATIVE HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (03) : 237 - 252
  • [6] Public-private Partnership: How and Why Six Community Colleges Loved and Left a For-profit Partner
    Negar Farakish
    Shanna Jaggars
    Maggie Fay
    Innovative Higher Education, 2020, 45 : 237 - 252
  • [7] Institutional effects on nurses' working conditions: a multi-group comparison of public and private non-profit and for-profit healthcare employers in Switzerland
    Aeschbacher, Remo
    Addor, Veronique
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2018, 16
  • [8] Institutional effects on nurses’ working conditions: a multi-group comparison of public and private non-profit and for-profit healthcare employers in Switzerland
    Remo Aeschbacher
    Véronique Addor
    Human Resources for Health, 16
  • [9] Healthcare workers' perspectives on access to sexual and reproductive health services in the public, private and private not-for-profit sectors: insights from Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia
    Ooms, Gaby I.
    van Oirschot, Janneke
    Okemo, Dorothy
    Reed, Tim
    van den Ham, Hendrika A.
    Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] Healthcare workers’ perspectives on access to sexual and reproductive health services in the public, private and private not-for-profit sectors: insights from Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia
    Gaby I. Ooms
    Janneke van Oirschot
    Dorothy Okemo
    Tim Reed
    Hendrika A. van den Ham
    Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse
    BMC Health Services Research, 22